Literature DB >> 17485904

The effects of fixation, processing and evaluation criteria on immunohistochemical detection of hormone receptors in breast cancer.

Tetsunari Oyama1, Yuko Ishikawa, Mitsuhiroi Hayashi, Kohji Arihiro, Jun Horiguchi.   

Abstract

A task force of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society has proposed a recommendation for adequate evaluation of hormone receptors in routine practice, in order to standardize handling of tissues, staining techniques and scoring systems. As a part of the study, several examinations were conducted to detect the effect of technical problems, including the influence of fixation time and other fixation and processing conditions, on the immunoreactivity for ERalpha. There is little influence of prolonged fixation on the immunoreactivity for ERalpha, except for cases in which particularly over-fixed blocks are used. A delay in the onset of fixation could decrease the immunohistochemical findings of steroid receptors, compared with shorter or longer fixation, and the situation is similar to the fixation of a whole large surgical specimen in formalin in a big bucket. Incomplete fixation might be an important cause of heterogeneiety of immunoreactivity for ERalpha. Manual and automated immunohistochemical (IHC) staining by DAKO (Glostrup, Denmark) and Biogenex (San Ramon, CA) and automated IHC staining by Ventana Medical Systems (Tucson, AZ) each employ different methods. Using a scoring system, in which the proportion of cells stained in each specimen was recorded as 0, less than 1%, 1% or more and less than 10%, and 10% or more, the intermethod variability of those IHC staining methods exhibited substantial multi-rater kappa values concerning the ER and PgR (kappa for ER according to the percentage of positive cells=0.67; PgR=0.72). Concerning intermethod consistency, the scoring system based on the percentage of positive cells was advantageous over other scoring systems, based on the intensity of nuclear staining. Using double staining, patients with ER-positive and HER2-positive tumors can be classified as those with co-expressed tumors and those with differently expressed tumors. As such, the co-expressed tumor might be resistant to antiestrogen therapy in ERalpha-positive and HER2-positive breast cancer and double staining might lead to the development of new therapeutic strategies for hormone and HER2-positive breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17485904     DOI: 10.2325/jbcs.976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   4.239


  18 in total

1.  Molecular profiling of individual tumor cells by hyperspectral microscopic imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan W Uhr; Michael L Huebschman; Eugene P Frenkel; Nancy L Lane; Raheela Ashfaq; Huaying Liu; Dipen R Rana; Lawrence Cheng; Alice T Lin; Gareth A Hughes; Xiaojing J Zhang; Harold R Garner
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 7.012

2.  The effect of freezing on the immunoprofile of breast carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Asuman Argon; Alper Şener; Osman Zekioğlu; Murat Kapkaç; Necmettin Özdemir
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.021

3.  The hazards of DAPI photoconversion: effects of dye, mounting media and fixative, and how to minimize the problem.

Authors:  Mojca Jež; Tuba Bas; Matija Veber; Andrej Košir; Tanja Dominko; Raymond Page; Primož Rožman
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 4.304

4.  Development of a computational high-throughput tool for the quantitative examination of dose-dependent histological features.

Authors:  Rance Nault; Dirk Colbry; Christina Brandenberger; Jack R Harkema; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 1.902

5.  The effect of prolonged cold ischemia time on estrogen receptor immunohistochemistry in breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoxian Li; Michael T Deavers; Ming Guo; Ping Liu; Yun Gong; Constance T Albarracin; Lavinia P Middleton; Lei Huo
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Fixed-Dose Combinations of Pioglitazone and Metformin for Lung Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Donna E Seabloom; Arthur R Galbraith; Anna M Haynes; Jennifer D Antonides; Beverly R Wuertz; Wendy A Miller; Kimberly A Miller; Vernon E Steele; Mark Steven Miller; Margie L Clapper; M Gerard O'Sullivan; Frank G Ondrey
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-01-04

7.  Quantitative histological assessment of xenobiotic-induced liver enzyme induction and pituitary-thyroid axis stimulation in rats using whole-slide automated image analysis.

Authors:  Rosario Garrido; Tanja S Zabka; Jianhua Tao; Mark Fielden; Adrian Fretland; Mudher Albassam
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.479

8.  Genome profiling of ERBB2-amplified breast cancers.

Authors:  Fabrice Sircoulomb; Ismahane Bekhouche; Pascal Finetti; José Adélaïde; Azza Ben Hamida; Julien Bonansea; Stéphane Raynaud; Charlène Innocenti; Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret; Carole Tarpin; Farhat Ben Ayed; Patrice Viens; Jocelyne Jacquemier; François Bertucci; Daniel Birnbaum; Max Chaffanet
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  An international study comparing conventional versus mRNA level testing (TargetPrint) for ER, PR, and HER2 status of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jelle Wesseling; Corrado Tinterri; Anna Sapino; Fabrizio Zanconati; Martijn Lutke-Holzik; Bichlien Nguyen; Kenneth B Deck; Patrizia Querzoli; Tiziana Perin; Carmela Giardina; Gerhard Seitz; Jean-Marc Guinebretière; Julie Barone; Laura Dekker; Femke de Snoo; Lisette Stork-Sloots; Paul Roepman; Toru Watanabe; Pino Cusumano
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Expression of TOMM34 and Its Clinicopathological Correlations in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder.

Authors:  Mohamed A H Ahmed; Mohamed Hassan Ali; Hashem Hafez Abbas; Gamal Ali Elatrash; Abd AlRahman Mohammad Foda
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.201

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.