Literature DB >> 17485558

Use and perceptions of clinical practice guidelines by internal medicine physicians.

Alisa M Shea1, Venita DePuy, Joseph M Allen, Kevin P Weinfurt.   

Abstract

The authors sought to explore the use and perceptions of clinical practice guidelines among internal medicine physicians. Through a Web-based survey, 201 board-certified internal medicine physicians rated their opinions on several statements using 7-point Likert scales. Most respondents (74.7%) felt that guidelines were suitable for at least half of their patients, although a failure to take comorbid conditions into account was a frequently cited barrier. For patients with cardiovascular disease, there was no difference between individual internists' perceptions of their own compliance with guidelines and their estimates of cardiologists' compliance (P = .14). A large majority of respondents (70.7%) believed that guideline committee member participation in industry-funded research introduces bias into guideline content (median [interquartile range], 5 [4-6]). Although most respondents felt that measuring physicians against guideline-based performance measures encourages evidence-based medicine (76.5%), opinions were split as to whether this practice distracts from patient care or compromises physician autonomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17485558     DOI: 10.1177/1062860607300291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  9 in total

1.  Current Status and Future Prospects of Clinical Psychology: Toward a Scientifically Principled Approach to Mental and Behavioral Health Care.

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; Richard M McFall; Varda Shoham
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2008-11-01

2.  Underrepresentation of individuals 80 years of age and older in chronic disease clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Lizebeth Cox; Marita Kloseck; Richard Crilly; Carol McWilliam; Laura Diachun
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  It's NOT FAIR! Or is it? The promise and the tyranny of evidence-based performance assessment.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bogdan-Lovis; Leonard Fleck; Henry C Barry
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2012-08

4.  Urologist compliance with AUA best practice guidelines for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Medicare population.

Authors:  Seth A Strope; Sean P Elliott; Christopher S Saigal; Alex Smith; Timothy J Wilt; John T Wei
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  What doctors think about the impact of managed care tools on quality of care, costs, autonomy, and relations with patients.

Authors:  Marie Deom; Thomas Agoritsas; Patrick A Bovier; Thomas V Perneger
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Perceptions and attitudes of clinicians in Spain toward clinical practice guidelines and grading systems: a protocol for a qualitative study and a national survey.

Authors:  Anna Kotzeva; Ivan Solà; José Miguel Carrasco; Petra Díaz del Campo; Francisco Javier Gracia; Enrique Calderón; Idoia de Gaminde; Maria Dolors Estrada; Flora Martínez; Carola Orrego; Rafael Rotaeche; Flavia Salcedo; Paola Velázquez; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  The role of Decision Support System (DSS) in prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raghupathy Anchala; Maria P Pinto; Amir Shroufi; Rajiv Chowdhury; Jean Sanderson; Laura Johnson; Patricia Blanco; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Oscar H Franco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Communication channels to promote evidence-based practice: a survey of primary care clinicians to determine perceived effects.

Authors:  Ann Dadich; Hassan Hosseinzadeh
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-08-11

9.  Clinicians' attitudes to oncology clinical practice guidelines and the barriers and facilitators to adherence: a mixed methods study protocol.

Authors:  Mia Bierbaum; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Gaston Arnolda; Geoffrey P Delaney; Winston Liauw; Richard Kefford; Yvonne Tran; Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig; Frances Rapport
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.