Literature DB >> 17485045

Long-term functional outcome and satisfaction after radial forearm free flap reconstructions of intraoral malignancy resections.

R Rhemrev1, H A Rakhorst, J M Zuidam, M A M Mureau, S E R Hovius, S O P Hofer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evaluation of objective and subjective functional follow-up results of intraoral radial forearm free flap reconstructions.
METHODS: A total of 149 patients had received radial forearm free flaps between January 1996 and December 2005. Seventy-two patients completed a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35 (EORTC H&N35) in the follow-up study. Patients were divided according to location of defect (anterior or posterior) or irradiation. Thirty-nine patients with anterior positioned flaps received standardised physical examinations.
RESULTS: Flap survival was 99.3%. Complications were divided in early (<2 weeks; 23%) and late complications (20%). Most common complications were dehiscence or fistula, responding well to conservative treatment. Analysis of questionnaire subscales showed no statistically significant differences between anterior and posterior defects. Irradiation showed significant impairment for the ability to smell and taste. No important donor site impairment was found.
CONCLUSION: The radial forearm free flap is an adequate method for reconstructions after resection of intraoral malignancies. Subjective functional outcome seemed to be defined by adjuvant radiotherapy, patient coping and, to a lesser extent, flap bulk for anterior defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17485045     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  7 in total

1.  [Application of computer-assisted design for anterolateral thigh flap in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction].

Authors:  S J Wang; W B Zhang; Y Yu; X Y Xie; H Y Yang; X Peng
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

Review 2.  Performance of the EORTC questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients EORTC QLQ-H&N35: a methodological review.

Authors:  Susanne Singer; Juan Ignacio Arraras; Wei-Chu Chie; Sheila E Fisher; Razvan Galalae; Eva Hammerlid; Ourania Nicolatou-Galitis; Claudia Schmalz; Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw; Eva Gamper; Judith Keszte; Dirk Hofmeister
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Change in reimbursement and costs in German oncological head and neck surgery over the last decade: ablative tongue cancer surgery and reconstruction with split-thickness skin graft vs. microvascular radial forearm flap.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoefert; Oliver Lotter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Sinonasal Side Effects of Chemotherapy and/or Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Riva; Ester Cravero; Claudia Pizzo; Marco Briguglio; Giuseppe Carlo Iorio; Chiara Cavallin; Oliviero Ostellino; Mario Airoldi; Umberto Ricardi; Giancarlo Pecorari
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Outcomes of Single Anastomoses for Superficial and Deep-System Venous Drainage of Radial Forearm Free Flaps.

Authors:  Mauricio Alejandro Moreno; Luke T Small; James Reed Gardner; Alexandrea H Kim; Emre Vural; Jumin Sunde
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2021-04-26

6.  Clinical Application of a Pedicled Forearm Flap in the Reconstruction After Oral Cancer Resection.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Zhao; Youmei Zhang; Shuai Fu; Changbin Zhang; Ming Li; Yong Wu
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Microsurgical free flaps: Controversies in maxillofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Rinku K George; Arvind Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.