Literature DB >> 17484797

Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors.

François Blondeau1, Nach G Daniel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence of various complications, including alveolitis, infection and paresthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve, in association with removal of impacted mandibular third molars. The relation between these 3 complications and several clinical variables (age, sex, degree of impaction, surgical difficulty and use of oral contraceptives) was also examined.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for all patients who underwent extraction of an impacted third molar in a single private dental practice over a 12-month period. A variety of data were collected for each patient, including age, sex, medical status at the time of the procedure and type of procedure performed. Patients were contacted at 2 days and 4 weeks after surgery to establish the occurrence of complications, and those with complications were treated; those with paresthesia were followed for at least 24 months.
RESULTS: A total of 550 impacted mandibular third molars were extracted from 327 patients (136 males and 191 females). The complication rate was 6.9%, consisting of 20 cases of alveolitis, 12 cases of infection and 6 cases of paresthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve. Of the 6 neurosensory deficits, 3 resolved and 3 were permanent. The risk factors associated with permanent neurosensory deficit were female sex, Pell and Gregory IC or IIC classification of impaction, and age greater than 24 years. The risk of postoperative alveolitis and infection was also greater among women. There was no significant relation between the use of oral contraceptives and alveolitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars should be carried out well before the age of 24 years, especially for female patients. Older patients are at greater risk of postoperative complications and permanent sequelae. A surgeon's lack of experience could also be a major factor in the development of postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17484797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0709-8936            Impact factor:   1.316


  66 in total

1.  Necessity of 3D visualization for the removal of lower wisdom teeth: required sample size to prove non-inferiority of panoramic radiography compared to CBCT.

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Daniel Wachtlin; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A multivariate statistical analysis on variables affecting inferior alveolar nerve damage during third molar surgery.

Authors:  R Pippi; M Santoro
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Assessing the need for computed tomography for lower-third-molar extraction: a survey among 322 dentists.

Authors:  S Sivolella; G Boccuzzo; E Gasparini; G De Conti; M Berengo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Common risk factors for postoperative pain following the extraction of wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-23

5.  Prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Juliet Hounsome; Gerlinde Pilkington; James Mahon; Angela Boland; Sophie Beale; Eleanor Kotas; Tara Renton; Rumona Dickson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Retrospective Study of 1198 Cases to Assess Indications for Surgical Removal, and Correlation with Age, Sex and Type of Impaction-A Single Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Shital Patel; Saloni Mansuri; Faizan Shaikh; Taksh Shah
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-06-10

7.  Accuracy of the vertical tube shift method in identifying the relationship between the third molars and the mandibular canal.

Authors:  Sergio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz; Anne Caroline Costa Oenning; Marcela Graciano Felizardo; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Deborah Queiroz de Freitas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Prevention of neurological injuries during mandibular third molar surgery: technical notes.

Authors:  Gerardo La Monaca; Iole Vozza; Rita Giardino; Susanna Annibali; Nicola Pranno; Maria Paola Cristalli
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2017-11-08

9.  Factors influencing lingual nerve paraesthesia following third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  H S Charan Babu; Praveen B Reddy; Rajesh Kumar B Pattathan; Rajendra Desai; A B Shubha
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-08-24

10.  Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Guerrero; Raul Botetano; Jorge Beltran; Keith Horner; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.