Literature DB >> 17484588

Differences between children and adults in the recognition of enjoyment smiles.

Marco Del Giudice1, Livia Colle.   

Abstract

The authors investigated the differences between 8-year-olds (n=80) and adults (n=80) in recognition of felt versus faked enjoyment smiles by using a newly developed picture set that is based on the Facial Action Coding System. The authors tested the effect of different facial action units (AUs) on judgments of smile authenticity. Multiple regression showed that children base their judgment on AU intensity of both mouth and eyes, with relatively little distinction between the Duchenne marker (AU6 or "cheek raiser") and a different voluntary muscle that has a similar effect on eye aperture (AU7 or "lid tightener"). Adults discriminate well between AU6 and AU7 and seem to use eye-mouth discrepancy as a major cue of authenticity. Bared-teeth smiles (involving AU25) are particularly salient to both groups. The authors propose and discuss an initial developmental model of the smile recognition process. Copyright (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17484588     DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  13 in total

1.  Recognition of posed and spontaneous dynamic smiles in young and older adults.

Authors:  Nora A Murphy; Jonathan M Lehrfeld; Derek M Isaacowitz
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-12

2.  Action unit classification using active appearance models and conditional random fields.

Authors:  Laurens van der Maaten; Emile Hendriks
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2011-10-12

3.  Automated Facial Action Coding System for dynamic analysis of facial expressions in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Jihun Hamm; Christian G Kohler; Ruben C Gur; Ragini Verma
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Individual differences in the recognition of enjoyment smiles: no role for perceptual-attentional factors and autistic-like traits.

Authors:  Valeria Manera; Marco Del Giudice; Elisa Grandi; Livia Colle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-07-07

5.  Children can discriminate the authenticity of happy but not sad or fearful facial expressions, and use an immature intensity-only strategy.

Authors:  Amy Dawel; Romina Palermo; Richard O'Kearney; Elinor McKone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-05

6.  Hiding true emotions: micro-expressions in eyes retrospectively concealed by mouth movements.

Authors:  Miho Iwasaki; Yasuki Noguchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Susceptibility to emotional contagion for negative emotions improves detection of smile authenticity.

Authors:  Valeria Manera; Elisa Grandi; Livia Colle
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Analysis of eye movements in the judgment of enjoyment and non-enjoyment smiles.

Authors:  Melanie Perron; Annie Roy-Charland
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-24

9.  Facial expressions depicting compassionate and critical emotions: the development and validation of a new emotional face stimulus set.

Authors:  Kirsten McEwan; Paul Gilbert; Stephane Dandeneau; Sigrid Lipka; Frances Maratos; Kevin B Paterson; Mark Baldwin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Inducing a concurrent motor load reduces categorization precision for facial expressions.

Authors:  Alberta Ipser; Richard Cook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.