Literature DB >> 17484029

Confounding in publications of observational intervention studies.

Rolf H H Groenwold1, Arno W Hoes, Eelko Hak.   

Abstract

We conducted a systematic literature search in Medline to assess the proportion of observational intervention studies appreciating confounding bias in peer-reviewed medical literature from 1985 through 2005. This study shows only 9% of all papers on observational intervention studies published in peer-reviewed medical journals mention any of the terms (confounding, adjustment, or bias) indicating appreciation of confounding.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17484029     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-007-9126-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  8 in total

1.  Assessment and control for confounding by indication in observational studies.

Authors:  B M Psaty; T D Koepsell; D Lin; N S Weiss; D S Siscovick; F R Rosendaal; M Pahor; C D Furberg
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Epidemiology--is it time to call it a day?

Authors:  G Davey Smith; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 3.  Confounding by indication in non-experimental evaluation of vaccine effectiveness: the example of prevention of influenza complications.

Authors:  E Hak; Th J M Verheij; D E Grobbee; K L Nichol; A W Hoes
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Data dredging, bias, or confounding.

Authors:  George Davey Smith; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-21

5.  Benefits of influenza vaccine in US elderly--appreciating issues of confounding bias and precision.

Authors:  Eelko Hak; Arno W Hoes; Jim Nordin; Kristin L Nichol
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Sensitivity analysis and external adjustment for unmeasured confounders in epidemiologic database studies of therapeutics.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 7.  Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

Authors:  J J Deeks; J Dinnes; R D'Amico; A J Sowden; C Sakarovitch; F Song; M Petticrew; D G Altman
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 8.  Confounding and indication for treatment in evaluation of drug treatment for hypertension.

Authors:  D E Grobbee; A W Hoes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-11-01
  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  Recent trends in publications in the European Journal of Epidemiology.

Authors:  Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Appropriate epidemiologic methods as a prerequisite for valid study results.

Authors:  Andreas Stang
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Discussion. Refining outcomes in dorsal hand coverage: consideration of aesthetics and donor-site morbidity.

Authors:  Frank Fang; Jae W Song; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  External adjustment sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding: an application to coronary stent outcomes, Pennsylvania 2004-2008.

Authors:  Marco D Huesch
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Field-wide meta-analyses of observational associations can map selective availability of risk factors and the impact of model specifications.

Authors:  Stylianos Serghiou; Chirag J Patel; Yan Yu Tan; Peter Koay; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Use of acid-suppressive drugs in pregnancy and the risk of childhood asthma: bidirectional crossover study using the general practice research database.

Authors:  Eelko Hak; Bianca Mulder; Catharina C M Schuiling-Veninga; Tjalling W de Vries; Susan S Jick
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Methods for the Selection of Covariates in Nutritional Epidemiology Studies: A Meta-Epidemiological Review.

Authors:  Dena Zeraatkar; Kevin Cheung; Kirolos Milio; Max Zworth; Arnav Gupta; Arrti Bhasin; Jessica J Bartoszko; Michel Kiflen; Rita E Morassut; Salmi T Noor; Daeria O Lawson; Bradley C Johnston; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Russell J de Souza
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2019-09-17

8.  Examining the Relationship between Heavy Alcohol Use and Assaults: With Adjustment for the Effects of Unmeasured Confounders.

Authors:  Wenbin Liang; Tanya Chikritzhs
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  An investigation of the significance of residual confounding effect.

Authors:  Wenbin Liang; Yuejen Zhao; Andy H Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  A proxy outcome approach for causal effect in observational studies: a simulation study.

Authors:  Wenbin Liang; Yuejen Zhao; Andy H Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.