| Literature DB >> 17484029 |
Rolf H H Groenwold1, Arno W Hoes, Eelko Hak.
Abstract
We conducted a systematic literature search in Medline to assess the proportion of observational intervention studies appreciating confounding bias in peer-reviewed medical literature from 1985 through 2005. This study shows only 9% of all papers on observational intervention studies published in peer-reviewed medical journals mention any of the terms (confounding, adjustment, or bias) indicating appreciation of confounding.Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17484029 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-007-9126-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Epidemiol ISSN: 0393-2990 Impact factor: 8.082