Literature DB >> 17484002

Benchmarking hospital outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

M A Edwards1, R Grinbaum, B E Schneider, A Walsh, J Ellsmere, D B Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands (LAGB) in June 2001, the number LAGB procedures performed in the United States has increased exponentially. This study aimed to benchmark the authors' initial hospital experience to FDA research trials and evidence-based literature.
METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 87 consecutive patients with a mean age of 43 years (range, 21-64 years) and a body mass index of 45.6 kg/m2 (range, 35-69 kg/m2) underwent an LAGB procedure at the authors' institution. The authors conducted a retrospective review of the outcomes including conversion, reoperation, mortality, perforation, erosion, prolapse, port dysfunction, excess weight loss, and changes in comorbidities, then compared the data with published benchmarks.
RESULTS: Gender, age, and body mass index were comparable with those of other series. Perioperative adverse events included acute stoma obstruction (n = 1) and respiratory complications (n = 2). Delayed complications included gastric prolapse (n = 4) and port reservoir malposition (n = 4). Five bands were explanted. The mean follow-up period was 14 months (n = 79). The mean percentage of excess weight loss was 30% (range, 4.7-69%) at 6 months, 41% (range, 9.6-82%) at 12 months, and 47% (range, 14-92%) at 24 months. Comorbidities resolved included diabetes (74%), hypertension (57%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (55%) and dyslipidemia (38%).
CONCLUSIONS: The short-term outcomes for LAGB were comparable with published benchmarks. With adequate weight loss, most patients achieve significant improvement in obesity-related illnesses. With new bariatric accreditation standards and mandates required for financial reimbursement, hospitals will need to demonstrate that their clinical outcomes are consistent with best practices. The authors' early experience shows that LAGB achieves significant weight loss with low mortality and morbidity rates. Despite a more gradual weight loss, most patients achieve excellent weight loss with corresponding improvement of comorbidities within the first 2 years postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17484002     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9302-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  29 in total

Review 1.  Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; James S Marks; Donna F Stroup; Julie L Gerberding
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Andrew E Chapman; George Kiroff; Philip Game; Bruce Foster; Paul O'Brien; John Ham; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Best practice recommendations for surgical care in weight loss surgery.

Authors:  John Kelly; Michael Tarnoff; Scott Shikora; Bruce Thayer; Daniel B Jones; R Amour Forse; Matthew M Hutter; Robert Fanelli; David Lautz; Frederick Buckley; Imtiaz Munshi; Nicolas Coe
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-02

4.  Commonwealth of Massachusetts Betsy Lehman Center for Patient Safety andMedical Error Reduction Expert Panel on Weight Loss Surgery: executive report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-02

5.  Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Jeffrey Root; Kambiz Zainabadi; Allen Sabio; Sara Chalifoux; C Melinda Stevens; Shahrzad Mavandadi; Mario Longoria; Samuel E Wilson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-12

6.  Laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity. Surgical outcome in 335 cases.

Authors:  G A Fielding; M Rhodes; L K Nathanson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Prospective study of a laparoscopically placed, adjustable gastric band in the treatment of morbid obesity.

Authors:  P E O'Brien; W A Brown; A Smith; P J McMurrick; M Stephens
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding at a U.S. center with up to 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Richard B Rubenstein
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  US experience with the LAP-BAND system.

Authors:  Christine J Ren; Santiago Horgan; Jaime Ponce
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 10.  Changes in comorbidities and improvements in quality of life after LAP-BAND placement.

Authors:  John B Dixon; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  5 in total

1.  Minimal-scar laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB).

Authors:  Eungkook Kim; Dohyoung Kim; Sangkuon Lee; Hongchan Lee
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Case Report of Patient Presenting in Shock from Band Penetration into Stomach After LAGB Surgery: Diagnosis by Emergency EGD After Misdiagnosis by Abdominal CT.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell; Estela Mogrovejo; Tusar Desai
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Analysis of poor outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Jason Kasza; Fred Brody; Khashayar Vaziri; Carl Scheffey; Sheldon McMullan; Brian Wallace; Fatima Khambaty
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Ten years experience with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Jean Biagini; Lamisse Karam
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Long-term results of the patients who were applied laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Sabri Özden; Barış Saylam; Fatih Mehmet Avşar
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2018-09-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.