Literature DB >> 17483342

DNA double-strand breaks form in bystander cells after microbeam irradiation of three-dimensional human tissue models.

Olga A Sedelnikova1, Asako Nakamura, Olga Kovalchuk, Igor Koturbash, Stephen A Mitchell, Stephen A Marino, David J Brenner, William M Bonner.   

Abstract

The "radiation-induced bystander effect," in which irradiated cells can induce genomic instability in unirradiated neighboring cells, has important implications for cancer radiotherapy and diagnostic radiology as well as for human health in general. Although the mechanisms of this effect remain to be elucidated, we reported previously that DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), directly measured by gamma-H2AX focus formation assay, are induced in bystander cultured cells. To overcome the deficiencies of cultured cell studies, we examined alpha-particle microbeam irradiation-induced bystander effects in human tissue models, which preserve the three-dimensional geometric arrangement and communication of cells present in tissues in vivo. In marked contrast to DNA DSB dynamics in irradiated cells, in which maximal DSB formation is seen 30 min after irradiation, the incidence of DSBs in bystander cells reached a maximum by 12 to 48 h after irradiation, gradually decreasing over the 7-day time course. At the maxima, 40% to 60% of bystander cells were affected, a 4- to 6-fold increase over controls. These increases in bystander DSB formation were followed by increased levels of apoptosis and micronucleus formation, by loss of nuclear DNA methylation, and by an increased fraction of senescent cells. These findings show the involvement of DNA DSBs in tissue bystander responses and support the notion that bystander DNA DSBs are precursors to widespread downstream effects in human tissues. Bystander cells exhibiting postirradiation signs of genomic instability may be more prone than unaffected cells to become cancerous. Thus, this study points to the importance of considering the indirect biological effects of radiation in cancer risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17483342     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  74 in total

1.  Radiation Induced Bystander Effect in vivo.

Authors:  Yunfei Chai; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Acta Med Nagasaki       Date:  2008

2.  microRNAome changes in bystander three-dimensional human tissue models suggest priming of apoptotic pathways.

Authors:  Olga Kovalchuk; Franz J Zemp; Jody N Filkowski; Alvin M Altamirano; Jennifer S Dickey; Gloria Jenkins-Baker; Stephen A Marino; David J Brenner; William M Bonner; Olga A Sedelnikova
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  H2AX phosphorylation in response to DNA double-strand break formation during bystander signalling: effect of microRNA knockdown.

Authors:  Jennifer S Dickey; Franz J Zemp; Alvin Altamirano; Olga A Sedelnikova; William M Bonner; Olga Kovalchuk
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 4.  Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Joe M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  New challenges in radiobiology research with microbeams.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Anna A Friedl
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Radiation induced bystander effects in mice given low doses of radiation in vivo.

Authors:  Harleen Singh; Rohin Saroya; Richard Smith; Rebecca Mantha; Lynda Guindon; Ron E J Mitchel; Colin Seymour; Carmel Mothersill
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Confocal microscopy for modeling electron microbeam irradiation of skin.

Authors:  John H Miller; William B Chrisler; Xihai Wang; Marianne B Sowa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 8.  Oxidative DNA damage caused by inflammation may link to stress-induced non-targeted effects.

Authors:  Carl N Sprung; Alesia Ivashkevich; Helen B Forrester; Christophe E Redon; Alexandros Georgakilas; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  Radiation-induced bystander effects in cultured human stem cells.

Authors:  Mykyta V Sokolov; Ronald D Neumann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Toxicity risk of non-target organs at risk receiving low-dose radiation: case report.

Authors:  Pei-Wei Shueng; Shih-Chiang Lin; Hou-Tai Chang; Ngot-Swan Chong; Yu-Jen Chen; Li-Ying Wang; Yen-Ping Hsieh; Chen-Hsi Hsieh
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.