Literature DB >> 17481980

Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit.

Yuri W Novitsky1, Andrew G Harrell, Joseph A Cristiano, B Lauren Paton, H James Norton, Richard D Peindl, Kent W Kercher, B Todd Heniford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy usually mandates the use of an intraperitoneal prosthetic. Visceral adhesions and changes in textile characteristics of prosthetics may complicate repairs, especially long-term. The aim of this study was to compare the adhesion formation, tissue ingrowth, and textile characteristics one year after intra-abdominal placement of the commonly used prosthetic meshes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty (4 x 4 cm) meshes were sutured using absorbable suture to an intact peritoneum in 20 New Zealand white rabbits. The study groups included: polypropylene (PP) [Marlex; C.R. Bard Inc, Cranston, NJ], expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) [DualMesh; WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ], ePTFE and PP (ePTFE/PP) [Composix, C.R. Bard Inc], reduced weight PP and oxidized regenerated cellulose (rPP/C) [Proceed; Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ]. The meshes were explanted after one year. Adhesions were scored as a percentage of explanted biomaterials' affected surface area. Prosthetic shrinkage was calculated. The strength of incorporation and mesh compliance were evaluated using differential variable reluctance transducers. Mesh ingrowth was measured as the load necessary to distract the mesh/tissue complex. Mesh compliance was calculated as the change in linear displacement of the sensors due to applied load. The groups were compared using Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: ePTFE had significantly less adhesions (0%) than both ePTFE/PP (40%) and PP (80%) groups (P < 0.001). The mean area of adhesions for the rPP/C (10%) and the ePTFE/PP (14%) groups was less than that for the PP group (40%) (P = 0.02). Prosthetic shrinkage was greatest in the ePTFE (32%) group than in any other group (P = 0.001). There were no differences in mesh incorporation between the groups. At explantation, mesh compliance in the ePTFE group was superior to other meshes (P < 0.0001). The rPP/C mesh induced the smallest change in the compliance of the tissue adjacent to the mesh (P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic materials demonstrate a wide variety of characteristics. Although exposed PP formed the most adhesions, up to 40% of the other PP-based meshes formed adhesions despite protective barriers. The ePTFE mesh did not induce adhesions and was the most compliant, however, this prosthetic's contraction was greatest. Reduced weight polypropylene (rPP/C) mesh induced the smallest change in the adjacent tissue pliability/compliance. Understanding of the long-term effects of various prosthetic materials is important to ensure an adequate hernia repair while minimizing postoperative morbidity and patient discomfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17481980     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  40 in total

1.  Long-term evaluation of adhesion formation and foreign body response to three new meshes.

Authors:  R R M Vogels; K W Y van Barneveld; J W A M Bosmans; G Beets; M J J Gijbels; M H F Schreinemacher; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparative evaluation of adhesions to intraperitoneally placed fixation materials: a laparoscopic study in rats: adhesions to fixation materials.

Authors:  Bulent Gungor; Zafer Malazgirt; Koray Topgül; Ali Gök; Mehmet Bilgin; Savaş Yürüker
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 3.  A review of the composition, characteristics, and effectiveness of barrier mesh prostheses utilized for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Corey R Deeken; Keith M Faucher; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Evidence of adaptations of locomotor neural drive in response to enhanced intermuscular connectivity between the triceps surae muscles of the rat.

Authors:  Michel Bernabei; Jaap H van Dieën; Huub Maas
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Efficacy of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release in a porcine model.

Authors:  W H Tan; J M McAllister; J A Blatnik
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Bioprosthetic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Donald P Baumann; Charles E Butler
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.314

7.  Evaluation of a knitted polytetrafluoroethylene mesh placed intraperitoneally in a New Zealand white rabbit model.

Authors:  Tomáš Novotný; Jiří Jeřábek; Karel Veselý; Robert Staffa; Martin Dvořák; Jan Cagaš
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Computed tomographic measurements of mesh shrinkage after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh.

Authors:  Ernst J P Schoenmaeckers; Steef B A van der Valk; Huib W van den Hout; Johan F T J Raymakers; Srdjan Rakic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Prospective double-blind randomized controlled study comparing heavy- and lightweight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: early results.

Authors:  Brij B Agarwal; Krishna Adit Agarwal; Krishan C Mahajan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: a single institution experience with 72 reoperations.

Authors:  E B Wassenaar; E J P Schoenmaeckers; J T F J Raymakers; S Rakic
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.