Literature DB >> 17481761

Auditory processing in an inter-modal oddball task: effects of a combined auditory/visual standard on auditory target ERPs.

Christopher R Brown1, Adam R Clarke, Robert J Barry.   

Abstract

Previous research examining auditory target ERPs in an inter-modal oddball task has shown that early components are affected by intra-modal processes, whilst components in the later part of the ERP, around 200-400 ms, are affected by both inter-modal and intra-modal processes. These findings led to the conclusion that there are separate stages of auditory target processing--an early modality-specific stage and a later context-dependent stage. The present study investigated this further by simultaneously presenting a visual standard stimulus with an auditory standard stimulus in an oddball task. The aim was to determine whether the inclusion of the visual standard stimulus in this task affected the ERP to targets. The auditory-visual oddball task consisted of a regularly presented combined auditory and visual standard stimulus (80%) and an infrequent auditory target (20%). The ERPs to targets in the auditory-visual oddball task were compared to those in an auditory oddball task, which had identical auditory stimuli and no visual standards. The results showed that the early components N100, P200 and N200 did not differ between tasks. This was in line with earlier results, and confirmed that activity up to 200 ms is unaffected by visual standard stimuli. The later components P250, P300 and P350 were larger and showed topographic differences in the auditory-visual oddball task. This was interpreted as reflecting separate inter-modal and intra-modal processes at later stages. In particular, the P300 and P350 components were argued to represent separate inter-modal and intra-modal components. Overall, this study provides further evidence of auditory processing occurring in two stages, an early modality-dependent stage and a later context-dependent stage.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17481761     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  5 in total

1.  Microsaccadic responses in a bimodal oddball task.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-03-05

2.  Capturing dynamic patterns of task-based functional connectivity with EEG.

Authors:  Nader Karamzadeh; Andrei Medvedev; Afrouz Azari; Amir Gandjbakhche; Laleh Najafizadeh
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Hemispheric differences in auditory oddball responses during monaural versus binaural stimulation.

Authors:  Casey S Gilmore; Brett A Clementz; Patrick Berg
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Modulation of early auditory processing by visual information: Prediction or bimodal integration?

Authors:  Maria V Stuckenberg; Erich Schröger; Andreas Widmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The human brain maintains contradictory and redundant auditory sensory predictions.

Authors:  Marika Pieszek; Andreas Widmann; Thomas Gruber; Erich Schröger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.