Literature DB >> 17481542

Serum biomarkers to differentiate benign and malignant mammographic lesions.

Susanna Shin1, Lisa Cazares, Heather Schneider, Shamina Mitchell, Christine Laronga, O John Semmes, Roger R Perry, Richard R Drake.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mammographic screening has increased detection of earlier-stage breast cancers and has decreased mortality from breast cancer. A Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 4 classification prompts a biopsy that most often reveals benign disease. Our objective was to determine if serum protein-expression profiles could be used to differentiate between benign and malignant mammographic lesions. STUDY
DESIGN: After IRB approval, women undergoing an image-guided biopsy for a BIRADS category 4 lesion were recruited. Serum was collected prebiopsy and labeled retrospectively after final pathology was reviewed. Serum was incubated with weak cation exchange magnetic beads and assayed in duplicate for analysis on matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) instrumentation (Bruker Daltonics). Spectra were analyzed using ClinProTools 2.0 software (Bruker Daltonics), and classifications determined using a genetic-clustering algorithm.
RESULTS: In a 14-month period, 260 subjects were recruited into this study. Sera from 92 subjects were randomly selected to form benign (n = 46) and cancer (n = 46) cohorts. The MALDI-TOF spectra analysis yielded 273 peaks, with 14 peaks expressed differentially (p < 0.05) between the cancer and benign cohorts. A genetic algorithm model was generated, yielding a sensitivity of 88.3% and specificity of 85.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: MALDI-TOF protein-expression profiles generated from BIRADS 4 sera could be used to distinguish between benign and malignant mammographic lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17481542     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  13 in total

1.  Comparative peptidome analyses of the profiles of the peptides ranging from 1-10 KD in CSF samples pooled from probable sporadic CJD and non-CJD patients.

Authors:  Cao Chen; Di Xiao; Wei Zhou; Yong-Chan Zhang; Qi Shi; Chan Tian; Jin Zhang; Chun-Xi Zhou; Jian-Zhong Zhang; Xiao-Ping Dong
Journal:  Prion       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.931

2.  Optimization of MALDI-TOF MS detection for enhanced sensitivity of affinity-captured proteins spanning a 100 kDa mass range.

Authors:  Christine L Gatlin-Bunai; Lisa H Cazares; William E Cooke; Oliver J Semmes; Dariya I Malyarenko
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Analysis of the urinary peptidome associated with Helicobacter pylori infection.

Authors:  Di Xiao; Fan-Liang Meng; Li-Hua He; Yi-Xin Gu; Jian-Zhong Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Selected reaction monitoring for colorectal cancer diagnosis using a set of five serum peptides identified by BLOTCHIP®-MS analysis.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Uchiyama; Yuji Naito; Nobuaki Yagi; Katsura Mizushima; Yasuki Higashimura; Yasuko Hirai; Osamu Dohi; Tetsuya Okayama; Naohisa Yoshida; Kazuhiro Katada; Kazuhiro Kamada; Osamu Handa; Takeshi Ishikawa; Tomohisa Takagi; Hideyuki Konishi; Daisuke Nonaka; Kyoichi Asada; Lyang-Ja Lee; Kenji Tanaka; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Eigo Otsuji; Yoshito Itoh
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 5.  Challenges to developing proteomic-based breast cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Richard R Drake; Lisa H Cazares; E Ellen Jones; Thomas W Fuller; O John Semmes; Christine Laronga
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2011-02-19

6.  Differential peptidomics assessment of strain and age differences in mice in response to acute cocaine administration.

Authors:  Elena V Romanova; Stanislav S Rubakhin; John R Ossyra; Jonathan A Zombeck; Michael R Nosek; Jonathan V Sweedler; Justin S Rhodes
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 5.372

7.  Plasma glycoprotein profiling for colorectal cancer biomarker identification by lectin glycoarray and lectin blot.

Authors:  Yinghua Qiu; Tasneem H Patwa; Li Xu; Kerby Shedden; David E Misek; Missy Tuck; Gracie Jin; Mack T Ruffin; Danielle K Turgeon; Sapna Synal; Robert Bresalier; Norman Marcon; Dean E Brenner; David M Lubman
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Serum peptidome patterns of breast cancer based on magnetic bead separation and mass spectrometry analysis.

Authors:  Nai-Jun Fan; Chun-Fang Gao; Guang Zhao; Xiu-Li Wang; Qing-Yin Liu
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  Non-invasive proteomics-thinking about personalized breast cancer screening and treatment.

Authors:  Manuel Debald; Matthias Wolfgarten; Gisela Walgenbach-Brünagel; Walther Kuhn; Michael Braun
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Serum peptidome patterns of colorectal cancer based on magnetic bead separation and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis.

Authors:  Nai-Jun Fan; Chun-Fang Gao; Xiu-Li Wang; Guang Zhao; Qing-Yin Liu; Yuan-Yao Zhang; Bao-Guo Cheng
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.