Literature DB >> 17480241

Global measures: utility in defining and measuring treatment response in dementia.

Barry Reisberg1.   

Abstract

Global measures used in treatment trials in dementia encompass two distinct categories: (1) clinician's interview-based global severity scales, and (2) clinician's interview-based global change scales. The global severity scales that have been used include: the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and the related CDR-sum of boxes (CDR-SB), the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), and the Functional Assessment Staging (FAST) procedure. The global severity scales are clearly useful in subject categorization in treatment trials, in part because they are relatively free of many of the sociocultural biases inherent in mental status and psychometric descriptors. Global severity scales can also be used to demonstrate therapeutic efficacy in terms of the general progression of the dementia process. These measures have also proven to be useful in sensitively assessing pharmacotherapeutic effects in Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatment trials. For example, in pivotal trials: (1) in Mild to Moderate AD, the GDS has shown significant change in response to medication, whereas the results on the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) were not significant, and (2) in Moderate to Severe AD, the FAST has shown significant pharmacotherapeutic efficacy, whereas the results using the MMSE were not significant. The global change scales employed in dementia trials differ widely in assessment methodology. Clinical Global Impressions of Change (CGIC) scales do not have defined methodologies, whereas Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus) scales are much more elaborate. The CIBIC-Plus procedures require an independent clinician assessment and can provide independent, comprehensive evidence of therapeutic efficacy. The CIBIC-Plus procedure may also be useful in sensitively assessing efficacy in future prevention trials, for example in subjects with Subjective Cognitive Impairment. For Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), global severity scales already appear to be one modality for the sensitive assessment of change. The CIBIC-Plus procedures might also productively be applied in future MCI therapeutic trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17480241     DOI: 10.1017/S1041610207005261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr        ISSN: 1041-6102            Impact factor:   3.878


  43 in total

1.  Ginkgo biloba Extract (EGb761), Cholinesterase Inhibitors, and Memantine for the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Onnita Thancharoen; Chulaporn Limwattananon; Onanong Waleekhachonloet; Thananan Rattanachotphanit; Phumtham Limwattananon; Panita Limpawattana
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Outcome over seven years of healthy adults with and without subjective cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Barry Reisberg; Melanie B Shulman; Carol Torossian; Ling Leng; Wei Zhu
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, education, brain volume, and future cognition.

Authors:  Catherine M Roe; Anne M Fagan; Elizabeth A Grant; Daniel S Marcus; Tammie L S Benzinger; Mark A Mintun; David M Holtzman; John C Morris
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2011-09

Review 4.  A Risk-Benefit Assessment of Dementia Medications: Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Jacob S Buckley; Shelley R Salpeter
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Validation of the multimodal assessment of capacities in severe dementia: a novel cognitive and functional scale for use in severe dementia.

Authors:  Sloane Heller; Carolina Mendoza Rebolledo; Carmen Rodríguez Blázquez; Laura Carrasco Chillón; Almudena Pérez Muñoz; Irene Rodríguez Pérez; Pablo Martínez-Martín
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Using the Folstein Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) to explore methodological issues in cognitive aging research.

Authors:  Todd Monroe; Michael Carter
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2012-06-15

7.  Adverse drug events in patients with advanced chronic conditions who have a prognosis of limited life expectancy at hospital admission.

Authors:  Daniel Sevilla-Sanchez; Núria Molist-Brunet; Jordi Amblàs-Novellas; Pere Roura-Poch; Joan Espaulella-Panicot; Carles Codina-Jané
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  The Effect of Baseline Patient and Caregiver Mindfulness on Dementia Outcomes.

Authors:  Ashley D Innis; Magdalena I Tolea; James E Galvin
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.472

9.  Update on the use of memantine in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert J van Marum
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 10.  Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 6. Management of severe Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Nathan Herrmann; Serge Gauthier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.