Barbra E Erickson1. 1. Department of Anthropology, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92834-6846, USA. beerickson@fullerton.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the use of radioactive radon therapy among persons with arthritis, and to explore their perceptions of risk versus benefit in using this therapy. DESIGN: This was a qualitative study based on loosely-structured and open-ended interviews, which were then analyzed for themes and patterns. SETTING: Participants in the study were recruited over a period of 5 years from clients of a radon health mine in southwestern Montana. RESULTS: Sixty-two mine clients were interviewed, consisting of 36 women and 26 men, ranging in age from 60 to 92 years. Participants believed that radon therapy was an acceptable choice of treatment for arthritis. Perceived benefits of such therapy included more effective pain relief, avoidance of medication side-effects, lower cost, and increased quality of life. The possible future risk of lung cancer from radon exposure was seen as minimal when compared to the perceived benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Fear about radon and its possible health risks seemed to have little influence on the decision-making process for the study subjects.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the use of radioactive radon therapy among persons with arthritis, and to explore their perceptions of risk versus benefit in using this therapy. DESIGN: This was a qualitative study based on loosely-structured and open-ended interviews, which were then analyzed for themes and patterns. SETTING:Participants in the study were recruited over a period of 5 years from clients of a radon health mine in southwestern Montana. RESULTS: Sixty-two mine clients were interviewed, consisting of 36 women and 26 men, ranging in age from 60 to 92 years. Participants believed that radon therapy was an acceptable choice of treatment for arthritis. Perceived benefits of such therapy included more effective pain relief, avoidance of medication side-effects, lower cost, and increased quality of life. The possible future risk of lung cancer from radon exposure was seen as minimal when compared to the perceived benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Fear about radon and its possible health risks seemed to have little influence on the decision-making process for the study subjects.
Authors: Katalin Nagy; István Berhés; Tibor Kovács; Norbert Kávási; János Somlai; Tamás Bender Journal: Radiat Environ Biophys Date: 2009-03-24 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Robbe Geysmans; Tanja Perko; Mirjana Keser; Christiane Pölzl-Viol; Ivana Fojtíková; Peter Mihók Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Michał Kasperczak; Jadwiga Kuciel-Lewandowska; Jan Gnus; Małgorzata Paprocka-Borowicz Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 3.411