Literature DB >> 17479737

The effects of divided attention on encoding processes in memory: mapping the locus of interference.

Moshe Naveh-Benjamin1, Jonathan Guez, Shai Sorek.   

Abstract

Despite the detrimental effects of divided attention at encoding on later memory performance, results described in the literature do not unequivocally specify which processes are interrupted during encoding by participants' occupation with a concurrent task. Using a processing analysis framework where the encoding process is viewed as a multiphase mental activity, the current research investigated this issue using a new differential temporal interference paradigm where the study phase of single words was interrupted at different temporal segments. In two experiments, we used performance on both memory and online choice reaction time tasks to assess whether such differential interference would produce different degrees of reduction in participants' later memory performance, as well as changes in the attentional resources required to execute each of the encoding phases. Measures of memory and concurrent task performance in the two experiments converged on similar patterns, showing that all phases of encoding are affected by the concurrent task. However, the initial encoding phase, which is tentatively associated with the initial registration of information, seems especially vulnerable to interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17479737     DOI: 10.1037/cjep2007001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  9 in total

1.  Monitoring the capacity of working memory: executive control and effects of listening effort.

Authors:  Nicole M Amichetti; Raymond S Stanley; Alison G White; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

2.  Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening.

Authors:  Patricia A Tun; Sandra McCoy; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-09

3.  Should Undergraduate Lectures be Compulsory? The Views of Dental and Medical Students from a UK University.

Authors:  Alaa Daud; Aaron Bagria; Kushal Shah; James Puryer
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-31

4.  Intention matters more than attention: Item-method directed forgetting of items at attended and unattended locations.

Authors:  Tracy L Taylor; Jeff P Hamm
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Is it worth it? The costs and benefits of bringing a laptop to a university class.

Authors:  Alison J Day; Kimberly M Fenn; Susan M Ravizza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A simulation of older adults' associative memory deficit using structural process interference in young adults.

Authors:  Yafit Oscar-Strom; Jonathan Guez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Available processing resources influence encoding-related brain activity before an event.

Authors:  Giulia Galli; A Dorothea Gebert; Leun J Otten
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Hand movement effects on word learning and retrieval in adults.

Authors:  Jessica Ciantar; Emma Finch; David A Copland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The effects of divided attention at encoding on specific and gist-based associative episodic memory.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Greene; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-06-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.