Literature DB >> 17478355

Laparoscopic supracervical versus total hysterectomy.

Thomas Lyons1.   

Abstract

Hysterectomy is one of the most effective surgical procedures developed in modern medical times. It treats multiple diagnoses with low morbidity in a reliable manor with very reproducible results. Therefore, in order to improve this procedure, any new procedure must be able to produce these same results with decreased morbidity. This article examines these criteria and evaluates the ability of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy to accomplish this task.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17478355     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  4 in total

1.  Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar SupraLoop™ Electrode versus Monopolar Needle in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy (LSH): An Interventional, Comparative Cohort Study.

Authors:  S Brucker; R Rothmund; B Krämer; F Neis; B Schönfisch; W Zubke; F A Taran; M Wallwiener
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  The influence of conventional and extended supracervical hysterectomy on sexuality and quality of life parameters: a prospective bi-center study with a special focus on postoperative spotting.

Authors:  C Spüntrup; M Banerjee; M Bordelius; M Hellmich; J Bojahr; B Bojahr; C Albus; G Noé
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Recurrence of endometriosis after hysterectomy.

Authors:  B Rizk; A S Fischer; H A Lotfy; R Turki; H A Zahed; R Malik; C P Holliday; A Glass; H Fishel; M Y Soliman; D Herrera
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2014

4.  Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared to total hysterectomy.

Authors:  Lucio Cipullo; Sania De Paoli; Luigi Fasolino; Antonio Fasolino
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.