Literature DB >> 17478158

Aortic arch geometry and exercise-induced hypertension in aortic coarctation.

Enrico De Caro1, Gianluca Trocchio, Attilio Smeraldi, Maria Grazia Calevo, Giacomo Pongiglione.   

Abstract

Hypertension at rest or during effort is not uncommon in patients with aortic coarctation (CoA), even those with a successful repair or mild degree of obstruction. Anatomic factors and functional abnormalities have been proposed as causes of this finding. Recently, aortic arch geometry was reported in association with hypertension at rest in patients with successful CoA repair. Forty-one patients (age 15.7 +/- 4.6 years) without significant obstruction at rest (mean systolic Doppler gradient at rest < or =25 mm Hg) were selected for the study. All patients underwent a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test and magnetic resonance imaging of the aorta. Aortic arch shape was defined on global geometry as normal, gothic, and crenel. Percentage of anatomic narrowing (AN) was also calculated. Twenty-four patients (58%) showed exercise-induced hypertension (EIH). Regarding the shape of the aortic arch, normal geometry was present in 17 patients (41%), 9 (21%) had gothic geometry, and 15 (36%) had crenel geometry. There were no differences among the 3 geometries in regard to the incidence of EIH (70.6% in normal, 55.6% in gothic, and 46.7% in crenel) or AN (36.9% in normal, 33.5% in gothic, and 36.6% in crenel). In conclusion, our results fail to show a correlation between a specific aortic arch shape and the incidence of EIH and significant AN in patients with native or residual CoA or repeat CoA. Therefore, at present, the role of aortic arch geometry in identifying patients at risk of EIH is still uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17478158     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise and exercise hypertension in patients with aortic coarctation.

Authors:  H J A Foulds; N B Giacomantonio; S S D Bredin; D E R Warburton
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Exercise testing is useful to screen for residual coarctation in children.

Authors:  Bibhuti B Das; Shashi Raj; Lawrence Shoemaker
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Predictive factors for residual hypertension following aortic coarctation stenting.

Authors:  Xavier Iriart; Jérémy Laïk; Antoine Cremer; Claire Martin; Xavier Pillois; Zakaria Jalal; François Roubertie; Jean-Benoît Thambo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-25       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  A statistical shape modelling framework to extract 3D shape biomarkers from medical imaging data: assessing arch morphology of repaired coarctation of the aorta.

Authors:  Jan L Bruse; Kristin McLeod; Giovanni Biglino; Hopewell N Ntsinjana; Claudio Capelli; Tain-Yen Hsia; Maxime Sermesant; Xavier Pennec; Andrew M Taylor; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Aortic arch shape is not associated with hypertensive response to exercise in patients with repaired congenital heart diseases.

Authors:  Hopewell N Ntsinjana; Giovanni Biglino; Claudio Capelli; Oliver Tann; Alessandro Giardini; Graham Derrick; Silvia Schievano; Andrew M Taylor
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Aortic morphological variability in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and aortic coarctation.

Authors:  Froso Sophocleous; Benedetta Biffi; Elena Giulia Milano; Jan Bruse; Massimo Caputo; Cha Rajakaruna; Silvia Schievano; Costanza Emanueli; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Giovanni Biglino
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.191

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.