Literature DB >> 17477959

A prospective study of the accuracy of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG PET) in identifying sites of metastasis prior to pelvic exenteration.

Amreen Husain1, Timothy Akhurst, Steven Larson, Khaled Alektiar, Richard R Barakat, Dennis S Chi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of (18)FDG PET in identifying sites of metastatic disease prior to pelvic exenteration or radical resection in patients (pts) with recurrent cervical or vaginal cancers.
METHODS: Pts with recurrent cervical or vaginal cancer being evaluated for surgical resection were enrolled in a prospective study approved by the institutional human subjects review board. All patients underwent (18)FDG PET scans as well as CT and/or MRI scans and were required to have pathologic confirmation of any sites suggestive of tumor recurrence.
RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2002 a total of 27 pts were enrolled on the study. Seven patients did not complete all study requirements and are excluded from further analysis. All pts had undergone prior pelvic radiation therapy and five patients had also received chemotherapy. CT/MRI scans identified three patients with possible metastatic disease in the following sites: (1) iliac nodes (2 pts) and (2) lungs (1 pt). After surgical and pathological evaluation, only one of these sites, the lungs, was confirmed to have metastatic disease. PET scans identified possible metastatic disease in nine patients and included the following sites: (1) pelvic nodes (4 pts), (2) para-aortic nodes (2 pts), (3) axillary node (1 pt), (4) bowel wall (1 pt) and (5) lungs (1 pt). After surgical and pathologic evaluation metastatic disease was identified in five of these pts at the following sites: iliac nodes, 2; para-aortic nodes, 1; bowel wall, 1; and lungs, 1. Of the sites identified by PET scan as areas of metastasis CT scan only identified the pulmonary metastasis.
CONCLUSION: (18)FDG PET was found to have a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 73% in detecting sites of extra-pelvic metastasis and may be the most accurate test to determine eligibility for pelvic exenteration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17477959     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  24 in total

1.  Role of preoperative MR imaging in the evaluation of patients with persistent or recurrent gynaecological malignancies before pelvic exenteration.

Authors:  Olivio F Donati; Yulia Lakhman; Evis Sala; Irene A Burger; Hebert A Vargas; Debra A Goldman; Vaagn Andikyan; Kay J Park; Dennis S Chi; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Role of MR Imaging and FDG PET/CT in Selection and Follow-up of Patients Treated with Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Yulia Lakhman; Stephanie Nougaret; Maura Miccò; Chiara Scelzo; Hebert A Vargas; Ramon E Sosa; Elizabeth J Sutton; Dennis S Chi; Hedvig Hricak; Evis Sala
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Vulvar Cancer and its Precursors. Guideline of the DGGG and DKG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/059, November 2015.

Authors:  H G Schnürch; S Ackermann; C D Alt; J Barinoff; C Böing; C Dannecker; F Gieseking; A Günthert; P Hantschmann; L C Horn; R Kürzl; P Mallmann; S Marnitz; G Mehlhorn; C C Hack; M C Koch; U Torsten; W Weikel; L Wölber; M Hampl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 4.  Gynecologic biopsy for molecular profiling: a review for the interventional radiologist.

Authors:  Bradley R Corr; Kian Behbakht; Monique A Spillman
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Pelvic exenteration in gynecologic oncology: a single institution study over 20 years.

Authors:  T Benn; R A Brooks; Q Zhang; M A Powell; P H Thaker; D G Mutch; I Zighelboim
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  [Total pelvic exenteration].

Authors:  U Heger; M Koch; M W Büchler; J Weitz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Treatment options in recurrent cervical cancer (Review).

Authors:  Angiolo Gadducci; Roberta Tana; Stefania Cosio; Luca Cionini
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Clinical outcome of pelvic exenteration in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Sota Tanaka; Satoru Nagase; Michiko Kaiho-Sakuma; Tomoyuki Nagai; Hiroki Kurosawa; Masafumi Toyoshima; Hideki Tokunaga; Takeo Otsuki; Hiroki Utsunomiya; Tadao Takano; Hitoshi Niikura; Kiyoshi Ito; Nobuo Yaegashi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  The impact of FDG-PET/CT in the management of patients with vulvar and vaginal cancer.

Authors:  N L Robertson; H Hricak; Y Sonoda; R E Sosa; M Benz; G Lyons; N R Abu-Rustum; E Sala; H A Vargas
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  The Prognostic Value of the Metabolic Tumor Volume in FIGO stage IA to IIB Cervical Cancer for Tumor Recurrence: Measured by F-18 FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Bum Soo Kim; In Joo Kim; Seong-Jang Kim; Hyun-Yeol Nam; Kyoung June Pak; Keunyoung Kim; Man Soo Yun
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.