Literature DB >> 17476524

Pain and changes in peripheral resistance at high vascular transmural pressure in the human forearm.

N D C Green1, M D Brown, J H Coote.   

Abstract

A hydrostatic rise in forearm vascular transmural pressure may be associated with an increase in forearm blood flow (FBF) that causes pain. To test this hypothesis, forearm vascular transmural pressure was elevated in eight male volunteers by a series of 1-min hypobaric exposures of the left arm to incrementing differential pressures of 40, 80, 120, 140, 160 and 200 mmHg. The series was repeated after a 30-min interval. Forearm venous pressure (FVP) was measured in the median antecubital vein, and FBF was determined by ultrasound Doppler in the axillary artery. Pain level was recorded by numerical rating scale. In all subjects, an increase in FBF and forearm vascular conductance (FVC) occurred (P < 0.05) at high FVP (mean +/- SE, 184 +/- 8 mmHg). Pain was linearly related to the increase in FVC. In the second series of exposures, increases in FBF, FVC and pain occurred at a lower transmural pressure (FVP 152 +/- 15 mmHg, P < 0.01). It is concluded that intense forearm pain is associated with a failure of autoregulation in the peripheral vascular bed and is worsened on repeated exposure to high transmural pressure. This may explain the overt forearm pain experienced by the crews of high performance military aircraft during manoeuvring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17476524     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0466-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  26 in total

Review 1.  The myogenic response: established facts and attractive hypotheses.

Authors:  R Schubert; M J Mulvany
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.124

2.  Comparison of vascular distensibility in the upper and lower extremity.

Authors:  O Eiken; R Kölegård
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  2004-07

3.  Regional vascular resistance vs. conductance: which index for baroreflex responses?

Authors:  D S O'Leary
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-02

4.  Effect of distal resistance on Doppler US flow patterns.

Authors:  E J Halpern; D A Merton; F Forsberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Measuring forearm blood flow and interpreting the responses to drugs and mediators.

Authors:  N Benjamin; A Calver; J Collier; B Robinson; P Vallance; D Webb
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Renal artery flow velocity analysis: a sensitive measure of experimental and clinical renovascular resistance.

Authors:  C S Norris; R W Barnes
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Some aspects of the arterial response to venous occlusion in man.

Authors:  M A Ireland; P Davies; W A Littler
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 6.124

8.  Arm arterial occlusion cuffs as a means of alleviating high +Gz-associated arm pain.

Authors:  N D Green
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1997-08

9.  Pain evoked by polymodal stimulation of hand veins in humans.

Authors:  J O Arndt; W Klement
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Vascular participation in deep cold pain.

Authors:  H Fruhstorfer; U Lindblom
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  2 in total

1.  G tolerance vis-à-vis pressure-distension and pressure-flow relationships of leg arteries.

Authors:  Ola Eiken; Igor Mekjavic; Patrik Sundblad; Roger Kölegård
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Sympathetic responses during saline infusion into the veins of an occluded limb.

Authors:  Jian Cui; Patrick McQuillan; Raman Moradkhan; Charles Pagana; Lawrence I Sinoway
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 5.182

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.