Literature DB >> 17475960

18F-FLT PET does not discriminate between reactive and metastatic lymph nodes in primary head and neck cancer patients.

Esther G C Troost1, Wouter V Vogel, Matthias A W Merkx, Piet J Slootweg, Henri A M Marres, Wenny J M Peeters, Johan Bussink, Albert J van der Kogel, Wim J G Oyen, Johannes H A M Kaanders.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Repopulation of clonogenic tumor cells is inversely correlated with radiation treatment outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. A functional imaging tool to assess the proliferative activity of tumors could improve patient selection for treatment modifications and could be used for evaluation of early treatment response. The PET tracer 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) can image tumor cell proliferation before and during radiotherapy, and it may provide biologic tumor information useful in radiotherapy planning. In the present study, the value of (18)F-FLT PET in determining the lymph node status in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was assessed, with pathology as the gold standard.
METHODS: Ten patients with newly diagnosed stage II-IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck underwent (18)F-FLT PET before surgical tumor resection with lymph node dissection. Emission (18)F-FLT PET and CT images of the head and neck were recorded and fused, and standardized uptake values (SUVs) were calculated. From all 18 (18)F-FLT PET-positive lymph node levels and from 8 (18)F-FLT PET-negative controls, paraffin-embedded lymph node sections were stained and analyzed for the endogenous proliferation marker Ki-67 and for the preoperatively administered proliferation marker iododeoxyuridine. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for (18)F-FLT PET.
RESULTS: Primary tumor sites were oral cavity (n=7), larynx (n=2), and maxillary sinus (n=1). Nine of the 10 patients examined had (18)F-FLT PET-positive lymph nodes (SUV(mean): median, 1.2; range, 0.8-2.9), but only 3 of these patients had histologically proven metastases. All metastatic lymph nodes showed Ki-67 and iododeoxyuridine staining in tumor cells. In the remaining 7 patients, there was abundant Ki-67 and iododeoxyuridine staining of B-lymphocytes in germinal centers in PET-positive lymph nodes, explaining the high rate of false-positive findings. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of (18)F-FLT PET were 100%, 16.7%, 37.5%, and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In head and neck cancer patients, (18)F-FLT PET showed uptake in metastatic as well as in nonmetastatic reactive lymph nodes, the latter due to reactive B-lymphocyte proliferation. Because of the low specificity, (18)F-FLT PET is not suitable for assessment of pretreatment lymph node status. This observation may also negatively influence the utility of (18)F-FLT PET for early treatment response evaluation of small metastatic nodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17475960     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.106.037473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  43 in total

Review 1.  Molecular imaging for personalized cancer care.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Hedvig Hricak; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Imaging of proliferation with 18F-FLT PET/CT versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wenfeng Yang; Yongming Zhang; Zheng Fu; Jinming Yu; Xiaorong Sun; Dianbin Mu; Anqin Han
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Novel positron emission tomography tracer distinguishes normal from cancerous cells.

Authors:  Muhammad Saeed; David Sheff; Amnon Kohen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Comparison of 3'-deoxy-3'-[¹⁸F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography (FLT PET) and FDG PET/CT for the detection and characterization of pancreatic tumours.

Authors:  K Herrmann; M Erkan; M Dobritz; T Schuster; J T Siveke; A J Beer; H J Wester; R M Schmid; H Friess; M Schwaiger; J Kleeff; A K Buck
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluorothymidine PET/CT for primary colorectal cancer and its lymph node metastasis: comparison with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT.

Authors:  Masatoyo Nakajo; Masayuki Nakajo; Yoriko Kajiya; Megumi Jinguji; Nobuaki Nishimata; Shunji Shimaoka; Tohru Nihara; Kuniaki Aridome; Sadao Tanaka; Yoshihiko Fukukura; Atushi Tani; Chihaya Koriyama
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Molecular imaging with FLT: a case of Cassandra's curse?

Authors:  Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Diagnostic usefulness of ¹⁸F-FAMT PET and L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Aiko Nobusawa; Mai Kim; Kyoichi Kaira; Go Miyashita; Akihide Negishi; Noboru Oriuchi; Tetsuya Higuchi; Yoshito Tsushima; Yoshikatsu Kanai; Satoshi Yokoo; Tetsunari Oyama
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Targeting the de novo biosynthesis of thymidylate for the development of a PET probe for pancreatic cancer imaging.

Authors:  Thushani D Nilaweera; Muhammad Saeed; Amnon Kohen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Single-Cell Characterization of 18F-FLT Uptake with Radioluminescence Microscopy.

Authors:  Debanti Sengupta; Guillem Pratx
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Molecular imaging of solid tumors: exploiting the potential.

Authors:  Wim J G Oyen; Winette T A van der Graaf
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.