Literature DB >> 17473750

Open fractures of the tibia treated by immediate intramedullary tibial nail insertion without reaming: a prospective study.

S Kakar1, P Tornetta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Does immediate tibial nail insertion without reaming as part of protocol-driven management provide a safe and effective treatment for open tibia fractures? STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort.
SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: A consecutive series of 161 patients with Gustilo grade I-IIIb open tibia fractures. INTERVENTION: Emergent incision and debridement of the wound with immediate tibial nail insertion without reaming, repeat incision and debridement, and soft-tissue coverage within 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Time to union, number of secondary procedures performed to obtain union, implant failures, and the type and incidence of complications.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three fractures were followed to union. Follow up averaged 2.2 years (0.6-5.5 years). Seventy-six fractures united in less than 6 months, 35 took between 6 and 9 months, and 32 took longer than 9 months. Twenty-five additional procedures were needed to obtain union in 16 of the delayed unions (12 nail exchanges, 4 bone grafts, 9 dynamizations). Complications included 3 patients with cellulitis, 1 superficial infection, 4 deep infections (1 grade I, 2 grade II, 1 grade IIIb), 3 loose screws, 2 broken screws, 5 malunions greater than 5 degrees, and 30 patients with decreased ankle motion when compared with the uninjured side. Not counting the ankle loss of motion, 18 complications occurred in 143 fractures (13%). Twenty-nine patients (20%) had complaints of minor knee pain and 30 (21%) had occasional fracture site pain after activity despite clinical and radiographic evidence of union. Eleven patients (8%) considered themselves completely disabled. Five patients were not treated by the standard protocol and are not included in the previously listed statistics; 3 were grade IIIB that did not have adequate coverage by 14 days, and 2 were grade II injuries that did not have a second debridement. Four of these 5 patients developed a complication.
CONCLUSIONS: Protocol-driven management emphasizing meticulous soft-tissue management and the use of immediate tibial nailing without reaming appears to be safe and effective in the treatment of open tibia fractures. The deep infection rate for the patients who were treated by protocol was 3% and the implant failure rate was lower than has been previously reported, most likely attributable to attempts to obtain cortical contact and avoid fracture gaps. Overall satisfaction was good, but approximately 41% of the patients had complaints of knee or fracture site pain or both well after union.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17473750     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3180336923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  19 in total

1.  Soft Tissue and Bone Reconstruction in Severe Open Fractures of the Lower Extremity.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Comparison of low, multidirectional locked nailing and plating in the treatment of distal tibial metadiaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  Yong Li; Lei Liu; Xin Tang; Fuxing Pei; Guanglin Wang; Yue Fang; Hui Zhang; Nicolas Crook
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Training in the practical application of damage control and early total care operative philosophy--perceptions of UK orthopaedic specialist trainees.

Authors:  W G P Eardley; D M Taylor; P J Parker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  [Fractures of the extremities with severe open soft tissue damage. Initial management and reconstructive treatment strategies].

Authors:  P Schwabe; N P Haas; K D Schaser
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  Risk factors for infectious complications after open fractures; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kirsten Kortram; Hans Bezstarosti; Willem-Jan Metsemakers; Michael J Raschke; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Michael H J Verhofstad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Reaming Does Not Affect Functional Outcomes After Open and Closed Tibial Shaft Fractures: The Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Carol A Lin; Marc Swiontkowski; Mohit Bhandari; Stephen D Walter; Emil H Schemitsch; David Sanders; Paul Tornetta
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  The Gustilo-Anderson classification system as predictor of nonunion and infection in open tibia fractures.

Authors:  R V Thakore; E L Francois; S K Nwosu; B Attum; P S Whiting; M A Siuta; M A Benvenuti; A K Smith; M S Shen; I Mousavi; W T Obremskey; M K Sethi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Open fractures of the tibia in the pediatric population: a systematic review.

Authors:  Keith D Baldwin; Oladapo M Babatunde; G Russell Huffman; Harish S Hosalkar
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 9.  Percutaneous grafting with bone marrow autologous concentrate for open tibia fractures: analysis of forty three cases and literature review.

Authors:  Louis-Romée Le Nail; Julien Stanovici; Joseph Fournier; Marie Splingard; Jorge Domenech; Philippe Rosset
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Immediate versus delayed intramedullary nailing for open fractures of the tibial shaft: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting deep infection and fracture healing.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Yokoyama; Moritoshi Itoman; Masataka Uchino; Kensuke Fukushima; Hiroshi Nitta; Yoshiaki Kojima
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.