Literature DB >> 17473658

EGFR and HER2 gene copy number and response to first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Federico Cappuzzo1, Claudia Ligorio, Claudio Ligorio, Luca Toschi, Elisa Rossi, Rocco Trisolini, Daniela Paioli, Elisabetta Magrini, Giovanna Finocchiaro, Stefania Bartolini, Alessandra Cancellieri, Fred R Hirsch, Lucio Crino, Marileila Varella-Garcia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A critical point in designing clinical trials comparing chemotherapy with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the expected benefit with standard chemotherapy in presence of biological features indicative of TKI sensitivity. The aim of this study was to assess whether EGFR and HER2 gene copy number and Akt activation are associated with response to first-line chemotherapy.
METHODS: Tumor samples from 190 patients with NSCLC were analyzed. EGFR and HER2 gene copy number were evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 185 and 184 cases, respectively. Akt activation was assessed by immunohistochemistry (n = 176). Additional biomarkers included EGFR DNA sequencing (n = 65), and EGFR immunohistochemistry (n = 185).
RESULTS: Response rate was not associated with EGFR, HER2, and P-Akt status, irrespective of the method used for biomarker assessment. Among patients with EGFR gene mutations, response to chemotherapy was observed only in individuals with exon 19 deletion (response rate: 46.6% versus 0%, p = 0.02). Among the 190 patients analyzed, 123 received a treatment with a TKI as second- or third-line therapy. When assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization or DNA sequencing, EGFR-positive patients seemed to be more sensitive to TKIs than to chemotherapy in terms of response rate and time to progression, whereas in EGFR-negative patients, response rate and time to progression favored chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: This study suggested that EGFR expression and gene copy number, HER2 gene copy number, and P-Akt expression are not associated with response to first-line chemotherapy in NSCLC. Prospective phase III trials should compare standard chemotherapy with a TKI in selected NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17473658     DOI: 10.1097/01.JTO.0000268676.79872.9b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  34 in total

1.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Pathway Biomarkers in the Randomized Phase III Trial of Erlotinib Versus Observation in Ovarian Cancer Patients with No Evidence of Disease Progression after First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Evelyn Despierre; Ignace Vergote; Ryan Anderson; Corneel Coens; Dionyssios Katsaros; Fred R Hirsch; Bram Boeckx; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Annamaria Ferrero; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Els M J J Berns; Antonio Casado; Diether Lambrechts; Antonio Jimeno
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  Predictive biomarker validation in practice: lessons from real trials.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Effect of lapatinib on the development of estrogen receptor-negative mammary tumors in mice.

Authors:  Tracy E Strecker; Qiang Shen; Yun Zhang; Jamal L Hill; Yuxin Li; Chunyu Wang; Hee-Tae Kim; Tona M Gilmer; Krystal R Sexton; Susan G Hilsenbeck; C Kent Osborne; Powel H Brown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  FGFR4 genetic polymorphisms determine the chemotherapy response of Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hong-mei Fang; Gang Tian; Li-juan Zhou; Han-ying Zhou; Ying-zhi Fang
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Evaluation of 7q31 region improves the accuracy of EGFR FISH assay in non small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Laura Casorzo; Mara Corigliano; Paolo Ferrero; Tiziana Venesio; Mauro Risio
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.644

6.  Rational use of cetuximab in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Charu Aggarwal; Hossein Borghaei
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Clinical trial designs for predictive biomarker validation: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  Serum levels of epidermal growth factor and HER-2 neu in non small-cell lung cancer: prognostic correlation.

Authors:  I Abdel Salam; H E Gaballa; N Abdel Wahab
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Different EGFR Gene Mutations in Exon 18, 19 and 21 as Prognostic and Predictive Markers in NSCLC: A Single Institution Analysis.

Authors:  Sabrina Rossi; Ettore D'Argento; Michele Basso; Antonia Strippoli; Vincenzo Dadduzio; Eleonora Cerchiaro; Maurizio Martini; Alessandra Cassano; Carlo Barone
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 10.  Tumor and host factors that may limit efficacy of chemotherapy in non-small cell and small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  David J Stewart
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.