Literature DB >> 1747363

Origin and treatment of fractures in spina bifida.

K Parsch1.   

Abstract

Children with spina bifida cystica have a high risk of fracturing their paraplegic legs. During the last fifteen years we observed 261 fractures and epiphyseal injuries in 173 children out of 1,400 (12.2%) patients with spina bifida. The increased risk of fracture seems to be due to reduced muscle activity in the paralysed limb with insufficient axial loading of the legs. A large proportion of fractures occurs after orthopedic interventions. Fractures are less common after urologic or neurosurgical procedures. Breaks are extremely frequent after operations in association with cast immobilization. Early standing and short immobilization times are the best defence mechanisms against fractures. If plasters are needed postoperatively one should preferably use the "Max and Moritz" standing cast. Fractures in spina bifida children heal quickly as compared to those in non-paralyzed children. In 30% excessive callus is seen. Immobilization for fracture care can be done in a standing cast even in the very early phase of treatment. In spite of the swelling and elevated temperature axial loading in the standing cast should continue. Splints and braces can be used instead of the plaster cast. By any means, the vicious circle of Fracture-Plaster-Fracture-Plaster should be avoided. Repeated stress on the growth plate causes a mechanism of loosening. The most common site is the distal tibia and femur, less often loosenings occur in the proximal tibia and proximal femur. Epiphyseal loosening is a nosological entity seen in spina bifida and also in congenital absence of sensation. Distal tibial epiphyseal loosening is frequently seen in adolescents who have learned to walk only after muscle balancing procedures in the hips.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1747363     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1042509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0939-7248            Impact factor:   2.191


  7 in total

1.  An approach for determining quantitative measures for bone volume and bone mass in the pediatric spina bifida population.

Authors:  Rachel E Horenstein; Sandra J Shefelbine; Nicole M Mueske; Carissa L Fisher; Tishya A L Wren
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Fixation of subtrochanteric extending/derotational femoral osteotomies with the Locking Compression Plate in ambulatory neuro-orthopaedic patients.

Authors:  Mathias Haefeli; Hanspeter Huber; Stefan Dierauer; Leonhard E Ramseier
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Fractures in spina bifida from childhood to young adulthood.

Authors:  A Trinh; P Wong; J Brown; S Hennel; P R Ebeling; P J Fuller; F Milat
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Incidence, prevalence, and characteristics of fractures in children, adolescents, and adults with spina bifida.

Authors:  Nienke P Dosa; Michael Eckrich; Danielle A Katz; Margaret Turk; Gregory S Liptak
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 5.  Osteoporosis in paediatric patients with spina bifida.

Authors:  Humberto Marreiros; Humberto Filipe Marreiros; Clara Loff; Eulalia Calado
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Fat-Bone Interactions in Adults With Spina Bifida.

Authors:  Anne Trinh; Phillip Wong; Anuradha Sakthivel; Michael C Fahey; Sabine Hennel; Justin Brown; Boyd J Strauss; Peter R Ebeling; Peter J Fuller; Frances Milat
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2017-09-27

7.  Quantitative Computed Tomography Assessment of Bone Deficits in Ambulatory Children and Adolescents with Spina Bifida: Importance of Puberty.

Authors:  Tishya Al Wren; Nicole M Mueske; Susan A Rethlefsen; Robert M Kay; Alexander Van Speybroeck; Wendy J Mack
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2020-11-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.