Literature DB >> 17473397

Adoption of medical devices: perspectives of professionals in Swedish neonatal intensive care.

Kerstin Roback1, Per-Olof Gäddlin, Nina Nelson, Jan Persson.   

Abstract

Advances in biomedical engineering enable us to treat increasingly severe conditions. This implies an increased need for regulation and priority setting in healthcare, to ensure appropriate safety cautions and to avoid accelerating expenditures. This interview study investigates the mechanisms behind the adoption and use of medical devices through the subjective experiences of hospital staff working with devices for neonatal intensive care. The adoption was found to be primarily initiated by vendor activities, but professionals preferably sought information about functionality from close colleagues. Full integration of devices was sometimes not achieved, and even though the adopting units had good introduction routines, there was no systematic follow-up of how adopted devices had been integrated in the work practices. Diffusion variations were, however, mainly found for temporarily tested devices and not for permanently available technologies. Three factors were found to be the major explanatory variables of the adoption of medical devices: (1) the subjective expected value of the device, (2) information and learning, and (3) the innovativeness of the adopting unit.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17473397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Health Care        ISSN: 0928-7329            Impact factor:   1.285


  5 in total

1.  Implementation of newly adopted technology in acute care settings: a qualitative analysis of clinical staff.

Authors:  Melissa L Langhan; Antonio Riera; Jordan C Kurtz; Paula Schaeffer; Andrea G Asnes
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2014-11-04

2.  Clinicians' Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators for the Adoption of Non-Invasive Liver Tests for NAFLD: A Mixed-Method Study.

Authors:  Yasaman Vali; Roel Eijk; Timothy Hicks; William S Jones; Jana Suklan; Adriaan G Holleboom; Vlad Ratziu; Miranda W Langendam; Quentin M Anstee; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Key factors influencing adoption of an innovation in primary health care: a qualitative study based on implementation theory.

Authors:  Siw Carlfjord; Malou Lindberg; Preben Bendtsen; Per Nilsen; Agneta Andersson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Evaluation of health research: measuring costs and socioeconomic effects.

Authors:  Kerstin Roback; Koustuv Dalal; Per Carlsson
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2011-10

5.  The CRADLE vital signs alert: qualitative evaluation of a novel device designed for use in pregnancy by healthcare workers in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Hannah L Nathan; Helena Boene; Khatia Munguambe; Esperança Sevene; David Akeju; Olalekan O Adetoro; Umesh Charanthimath; Mrutyunjaya B Bellad; Annemarie de Greeff; John Anthony; David R Hall; Wilhelm Steyn; Marianne Vidler; Peter von Dadelszen; Lucy C Chappell; Jane Sandall; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.