Literature DB >> 17473347

The influence of cooling rate on the accuracy of normoxic polymer gel dosimeters.

Y De Deene1, G Pittomvils, S Visalatchi.   

Abstract

Polymer gel dosimeters offer a wide range of applications in the three-dimensional verification of complex radiation dose distributions such as in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). With the release of polymer gel dosimeters that can be fabricated in normal atmospheric ('normoxic') conditions, the gel manufacturing process has been significantly simplified. Gel dosimeters are calibrated by use of a series of calibration vials irradiated with known doses or by use of a calibration phantom with a known dose distribution. The overall accuracy of the polymer gel dosimeters is determined by different dosimetric properties. In this study, we show the influence of the temperature history during storage of the gel dosimeter on the dose response curve for two gel dosimeters using the monomers acrylamide/N,N'-methylene-bis-acrylamide (nPAG) and methacrylic acid (nMAG) respectively and bis[tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium]sulphate (THP) as antioxidant in both gel dosimeters. This study reveals that differences in temperature history after fabrication of normoxic polymer gel dosimeters may compromise the dosimetric accuracy. It was found that the acrylamide based gel dosimeter (nPAG) is less dependent on the post-manufacture temperature history than the methacrylic acid based gel dosimeter (nMAG). The importance of an equal temperature history for the gel dosimeter and calibration vials is emphasized by this study. A reproducibility study has also been performed on the nPAG gel dosimeter when additional efforts are made to control the temperature changes upon cooling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17473347     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/10/006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

Review 1.  Polymer gel dosimetry.

Authors:  C Baldock; Y De Deene; S Doran; G Ibbott; A Jirasek; M Lepage; K B McAuley; M Oldham; L J Schreiner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  3D dosimetric validation of ultrasound-guided radiotherapy with a dynamically deformable abdominal phantom.

Authors:  Charles K Matrosic; Wesley Culberson; Andrew Shepard; Sydney Jupitz; Bryan Bednarz
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.685

3.  Small field dose delivery evaluations using cone beam optical computed tomography-based polymer gel dosimetry.

Authors:  Timothy Olding; Oliver Holmes; Paul Dejean; Kim B McAuley; Ken Nkongchu; Giles Santyr; L John Schreiner
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2011-01

Review 4.  Three-dimensional radiation dosimetry using polymer gel and solid radiochromic polymer: From basics to clinical applications.

Authors:  Yoichi Watanabe; Leighton Warmington; N Gopishankar
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-28

5.  Dose and slice thickness evaluation with nMAG gel dosimeters in computed tomography.

Authors:  Chun-Chao Chuang; Jay Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Three-dimensional dose comparison of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) radiation therapy by using NIPAM gel dosimetry.

Authors:  Chun-Hsu Yao; Tung-Hao Chang; Chia-Chi Lin; Yuan-Chun Lai; Chin-Hsing Chen; Yuan-Jen Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Radiation Dosimetry by Use of Radiosensitive Hydrogels and Polymers: Mechanisms, State-of-the-Art and Perspective from 3D to 4D.

Authors:  Yves De Deene
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-09-19

8.  Effect of composition interactions on the dose response of an N-isopropylacrylamide gel dosimeter.

Authors:  Yuan-Jen Chang; Bor-Tsung Hsieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of NIPAM Polymer Gel Dosimeters on Three Orthogonal Planes and Temporal Stability Analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Yuan Cheng; Ling-Ling Hsieh; Cheng-Ting Shih
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.