Literature DB >> 17472819

Nebulized arformoterol in patients with COPD: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled trial.

Rudolf A Baumgartner1, Nicola A Hanania, William J Calhoun, Steven A Sahn, Kenneth Sciarappa, John P Hanrahan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of nebulized arformoterol tartrate (a selective, long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist that is the [R,R] isomer of formoterol) and salmeterol xinafoate versus placebo in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
METHODS: This 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled trial was conducted at 60 centers across the United States. Male and female patients aged >or=35 years with physician-diagnosed COPD received arformoterol (15 microg BID, 25 microg BID, or 50 microg QD via nebulizer), salmeterol (42 microg BID via metered dose inhaler), or placebo. Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry; dyspnea, by the Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI); and health status, by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed by site personnel at all clinic visits (screening, first dose at week 0, and at weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, and follow-up). COPD exacerbations were defined as worsening respiratory status requiring a change in medication or an unscheduled provider visit.
RESULTS: A total of 717 patients received study medication. The demographic composition of all treatment arms was similar. The mean age was 62.9 years, 58% were men, and mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) was 1.2 L (41% predicted). Mean improvement in trough FEV(1) over 12 weeks was significantly greater with all 3 arformoterol doses (15 microg BID, +16.9%; 25 microg BID, +18.9%; 50 microg QD, +14.9%) and for salmeterol (+17.4%) relative to placebo (+6.0%; P < 0.001). There were significantly greater improvements in the mean percentage change in FEV(1) AUC(0-12h) from the predose value over 12 weeks (15 microg BID, 12.7%, 25 microg BID, 13.9%, 50 microg QD, 18.9%; salmeterol, 9.8%) versus placebo (2.7%; P <or= 0.001); all doses of arformoterol were statistically different from salmeterol for this end point (P <or= 0.024). At week 12, TDI focal scores were significantly greater with all arformoterol doses compared with placebo (mean [95% CI]: 15 microg BID, 0.97 [0.25-1.69]; 25 microg BID, 1.08 [0.3-1.86]; 50 microg QD, 1.04 [0.32-1.771), suggesting treatment-associated improvement in dyspnea, however, the difference between salmeterol and placebo was not statistically significant (0.36 [-0.40 to 1.12]). Improvements in health status, as measured using SGRQ total scores, were -2.6 to -3.6 U in the arformoterol groups, -4.4 U for salmeterol, and -1.2 U for placebo; 95% CI of differences versus placebo suggested significant improvement for the arformoterol 25 microg BID and salmeterol groups. There was a similar frequency of AEs and COPD exacerbations across all groups, including placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, patients with moderate to severe COPD administered nebulized arformoterol over 12 weeks were observed to have significant and sustained improvements in airway function and dyspnea compared with placebo. The results also suggest that all doses of arformoterol, including the lowest dose (15 microg BID), were effective. Overall, nebulized arformoterol was well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17472819     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  20 in total

Review 1.  Copd.

Authors:  Robert Andrew McIvor; Marcel Tunks; David Charles Todd
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-06-06

Review 2.  Long-Acting β2-Agonists in Asthma: Enantioselective Safety Studies are Needed.

Authors:  Glenn A Jacobson; Sharanne Raidal; Morten Hostrup; Luigino Calzetta; Richard Wood-Baker; Mark O Farber; Clive P Page; E Haydn Walters
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Nebulized formoterol: a review of clinical efficacy and safety in COPD.

Authors:  Nicholas J Gross; James F Donohue
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 4.  Long-acting beta-agonists in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current and future agents.

Authors:  Donald P Tashkin; Leonardo M Fabbri
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2010-10-29

5.  Efficacy and safety of nebulized formoterol as add-on therapy in COPD patients receiving maintenance tiotropium bromide: Results from a 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.

Authors:  Nicola A Hanania; Ahmad Boota; Edward Kerwin; LaTanya Tomlinson; Kimberly Denis-Mize
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Relationship between FEV1 change and patient-reported outcomes in randomised trials of inhaled bronchodilators for stable COPD: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marie Westwood; Jean Bourbeau; Paul W Jones; Annamaria Cerulli; Gorana Capkun-Niggli; Gill Worthy
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2011-04-08

7.  Pharmacotherapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis.

Authors:  Edward J Mills; Eric Druyts; Isabella Ghement; Milo A Puhan
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 8.  Changing patterns in long-acting bronchodilator trials in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  James F Donohue; Paul W Jones
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2011-01-07

9.  Inhaled drugs to reduce exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Milo A Puhan; Lucas M Bachmann; Jos Kleijnen; Gerben Ter Riet; Alphons G Kessels
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Optimizing safety of COPD treatments: role of the nurse practitioner.

Authors:  Pamela Spencer; Nicola A Hanania
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2013-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.