Literature DB >> 17472303

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: what have we learned?

Harlan C Amstutz1, Pat Campbell, Michel J Le Duff.   

Abstract

Surface hip arthroplasty has many attractive features for young, active patients, particularly because of the conservative nature of this treatment and its ability to preserve femoral bone. It is more anatomic and physiologic than stem-type hip replacements, and it represents a truly minimally osteoinvasive procedure, with no penetration into the femoral intramedullary canal. In addition, the construct has increased stability because of the near-normal diameter of the femoral component compared with most conventional hip replacement components. Although the short- to midterm clinical results for metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing implants are definitely superior to those of earlier generations of resurfacing implants, the results of conventional total hip replacement using contemporary designs and bearing materials have also improved. As a result, it is imperative to assess what is known about the safety and efficacy of resurfacing to refine the indications and technique to improve the overall results and durability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17472303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Instr Course Lect        ISSN: 0065-6895


  5 in total

1.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Approach to painful hip resurfacing].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; H Gollwitzer; P Diehl; M Fuerst; M Schmitt-Sody
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Does hip resurfacing require larger acetabular cups than conventional THA?

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Michael S H Kain; Otmar Hersche; Urs Munzinger; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Craig J Della Valle; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Influence of head size on the development of metallic wear and on the characteristics of carbon layers in metal-on-metal hip joints.

Authors:  Volker Braunstein; Christoph M Sprecher; Markus A Wimmer; Stefan Milz; Georg Taeger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.