Literature DB >> 17471561

Surveillance for familial breast cancer: Differences in outcome according to BRCA mutation status.

Pal Moller1, D Gareth Evans, Marta M Reis, Helen Gregory, Elaine Anderson, Lovise Maehle, Fiona Lalloo, Anthony Howell, Jaran Apold, Neal Clark, Anneke Lucassen, C Michael Steel.   

Abstract

Women with a family history of breast cancer are commonly offered regular clinical or mammographic surveillance from age 30. Data on the efficacy of such programmes are limited. Clinical, pathological and outcome data were recorded on all breast and ovarian cancers diagnosed within familial breast cancer surveillance programmes at collaborating centers in Norway and the UK up to the end of 2005. These have been analyzed according to the mutation status of the affected women (BRCA1+ve, BRCA2+ve or mutation-negative). Breast cancer was diagnosed in 442 patients subsequently followed for a total of 2095 years. Eighty-nine (20%) had BRCA1 mutations, 35 (8%) BRCA2 mutations and in 318 (72%) no mutation could be detected ("mut neg"). Five-year survival in BRCA1 was 73% compared to 96% in BRCA2 and 92% in mut neg (p = 0.000). Among BRCA1 mutation-carriers, 5-year survival was 67% for cases diagnosed as carcinoma in situ, 84% for node-negative invasive cancers and 58% for those with nodal involvement (p > 0.05). For BRCA2 mutation-carriers the corresponding figures were 100, 100 and 90% (p > 0.05), while for mut neg women they were 100, 97 and 71% (p = 0.03). Regular surveillance in women at increased familial risk of breast cancer is associated with a good outcome if they carry BRCA2 mutations or no detectable mutation. Carriers of BRCA1 mutations fare significantly worse, even when their tumors are diagnosed at an apparently early stage. The differences in outcome associated with different genetic causes of disease were associated with demonstrated differences in tumor biology. The findings demonstrate the outcome for genetically different breast cancers detected within a programme for early diagnosis and treatment, which is relevant to genetic counseling when women at risk have to chose between the options for preventing death from inherited breast cancer. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17471561     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  35 in total

Review 1.  Triple-negative breast cancer: present challenges and new perspectives.

Authors:  Franca Podo; Lutgarde M C Buydens; Hadassa Degani; Riet Hilhorst; Edda Klipp; Ingrid S Gribbestad; Sabine Van Huffel; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Jan Luts; Daniel Monleon; Geert J Postma; Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra; Filippo Santoro; Hans Wouters; Hege G Russnes; Therese Sørlie; Elda Tagliabue; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Outcome of triple-negative breast cancer in patients with or without deleterious BRCA mutations.

Authors:  Soley Bayraktar; Angelica M Gutierrez-Barrera; Diane Liu; Tunc Tasbas; Ugur Akar; Jennifer K Litton; E Lin; Constance T Albarracin; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Banu K Arun
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Effect of BRCA2 mutation on familial breast cancer survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Shao; Jie Yang; Jun-Nai Wang; Long Qiao; Wei Fan; Qing-Lei Gao; Yao-Jun Feng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-22

4.  Effects of BRCA1- and BRCA2-related mutations on ovarian and breast cancer survival: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qian Zhong; Hong-Ling Peng; Xia Zhao; Lin Zhang; Wei-Ting Hwang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Differing clinical impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Guoyan Liu; Da Yang; Yan Sun; Ilya Shmulevich; Fengxia Xue; Anil K Sood; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  High penetrances of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations confirmed in a prospective series.

Authors:  Pål Møller; Lovise Mæhle; Lars F Engebretsen; Trond Ludvigsen; Christoffer Jonsrud; Jaran Apold; Anita Vabø; Neal Clark
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.857

7.  Breast cancer in the personal genomics era.

Authors:  Rachel E Ellsworth; David J Decewicz; Craig D Shriver; Darrell L Ellsworth
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.236

8.  Gene promoter methylation is associated with increased mortality among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Xinran Xu; Marilie D Gammon; Yujing Zhang; Yoon Hee Cho; James G Wetmur; Patrick T Bradshaw; Gail Garbowski; Hanina Hibshoosh; Susan L Teitelbaum; Alfred I Neugut; Regina M Santella; Jia Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Genetic counselling and testing for inherited gene mutations in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer: a review of the existing literature and a proposed research agenda.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Kathy Tucker; Michael Friedlander; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Elizabeth Lobb; Christobel Saunders; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Cumulative survival in early-onset unilateral and bilateral breast cancer: an analysis of 1907 Taiwanese women.

Authors:  W-H Kuo; A M-F Yen; P-H Lee; K-M Chen; J Wang; K-J Chang; T H-H Chen; H-S Tsau
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.