Literature DB >> 17470944

Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: evaluating the 'margins of error' of group v. individual predictions of violence.

Stephen D Hart1, Christine Michie, David J Cooke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Actuarial risk assessment instruments (ARAIs) estimate the probability that individuals will engage in future violence. AIMS: To evaluate the ;margins of error' at the group and individual level for risk estimates made using ARAIs.
METHOD: An established statistical method was used to construct 95% CI for group and individual risk estimates made using two popular ARAIs.
RESULTS: The 95% CI were large for risk estimates at the group level; at the individual level, they were so high as to render risk estimates virtually meaningless.
CONCLUSIONS: The ARAIs cannot be used to estimate an individual's risk for future violence with any reasonable degree of certainty and should be used with great caution or not at all. In theory, reasonably precise group estimates could be made using ARAIs if developers used very large construction samples and if the tests included few score categories with extreme risk estimates.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17470944     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.190.5.s60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl        ISSN: 0960-5371


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Sadistic fetishism--deadly passion. Forensic psychiatric assessment of sex offenders].

Authors:  N Nedopil; I Blümcke; H Bock; B Bogerts; C Born; S Stübner
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Replicating the violence risk appraisal guide: a total forensic cohort study.

Authors:  Astrid Rossegger; Jérôme Endrass; Juliane Gerth; Jay P Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Predicting hospital aggression in secure psychiatric care.

Authors:  Jane L Ireland; Lee J Priday; Carol A Ireland; Simon Chu; Jennifer Kilcoyne; Caroline Mulligan
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2016-02-19

4.  The Base Rate Study: Developing Base Rates for Risk Factors and Indicators for Engagement in Violent Extremism.

Authors:  Caitlin Clemmow; Sandy Schumann; Nadine L Salman; Paul Gill
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 5.  Rates of violence in patients classified as high risk by structured risk assessment instruments.

Authors:  Jay P Singh; Seena Fazel; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Alec Buchanan
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.319

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.