BACKGROUND: Coeliac disease may be regarded as refractory disease (RCD) when symptoms persist or recur despite strict adherence to a gluten-free diet. RCD may be subdivided into types I and II with a phenotypically normal and aberrant intraepithelial T-cell population, respectively. RCD I seems to respond well to azathioprine/prednisone therapy. RCD II is usually resistant to any known therapy and transition into enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is common. AIM: To provide further insight into RCD and the development of EATL, by reporting on long-term survival and risk of transition of RCD into EATL in a large cohort of patients with complicated coeliac disease. DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective comparison of responses to therapy in four groups of patients with complicated coeliac disease: 43, RCD I; 50, RCD II (total), of whom 26 with RCD II developed EATL after a period of refractoriness to a gluten-free diet (secondary EATL) and 13 were EATL patients without preceding history of complicated coeliac disease (de novo EATL). RESULTS: No coeliac-disease-related mortality was recognised in the RCD I group. The overall 5-year survival in the RCD I group it was 96%; in the RCD II (total) group was 58%; and in the RCD II group after developing EATL it was only 8%. The 2-year survival in the de novo EATL group was 20% versus 15% in secondary EATL group (p = 0.63). Twenty-eight (56%) of the 50 patients with RCD II died, 23 (46%) due to EATL, 4 due to a progressive refractory state with emaciation and 1 from neurocoeliac disease. CONCLUSION: Remarkably, no patient with RCD I developed RCD II or EATL within the mean follow-up period of 5 years (range 2-15 years). A total of 52% of the RCD II patients developed EATL within 4-6 years after the diagnosis of RCD II. More aggressive and targeted therapies seem necessary in RCD II and EATL.
BACKGROUND:Coeliac disease may be regarded as refractory disease (RCD) when symptoms persist or recur despite strict adherence to a gluten-free diet. RCD may be subdivided into types I and II with a phenotypically normal and aberrant intraepithelial T-cell population, respectively. RCD I seems to respond well to azathioprine/prednisone therapy. RCD II is usually resistant to any known therapy and transition into enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is common. AIM: To provide further insight into RCD and the development of EATL, by reporting on long-term survival and risk of transition of RCD into EATL in a large cohort of patients with complicated coeliac disease. DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective comparison of responses to therapy in four groups of patients with complicated coeliac disease: 43, RCD I; 50, RCD II (total), of whom 26 with RCD II developed EATL after a period of refractoriness to a gluten-free diet (secondary EATL) and 13 were EATL patients without preceding history of complicated coeliac disease (de novo EATL). RESULTS: No coeliac-disease-related mortality was recognised in the RCD I group. The overall 5-year survival in the RCD I group it was 96%; in the RCD II (total) group was 58%; and in the RCD II group after developing EATL it was only 8%. The 2-year survival in the de novo EATL group was 20% versus 15% in secondary EATL group (p = 0.63). Twenty-eight (56%) of the 50 patients with RCD II died, 23 (46%) due to EATL, 4 due to a progressive refractory state with emaciation and 1 from neurocoeliac disease. CONCLUSION: Remarkably, no patient with RCD I developed RCD II or EATL within the mean follow-up period of 5 years (range 2-15 years). A total of 52% of the RCD IIpatients developed EATL within 4-6 years after the diagnosis of RCD II. More aggressive and targeted therapies seem necessary in RCD II and EATL.
Authors: N Patey-Mariaud De Serre; C Cellier; B Jabri; E Delabesse; V Verkarre; B Roche; A Lavergne; J Brière; L Mauvieux; M Leborgne; J P Barbier; R Modigliani; C Matuchansky; E MacIntyre; N Cerf-Bensussan; N Brousse Journal: Histopathology Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: G Corrao; G R Corazza; V Bagnardi; G Brusco; C Ciacci; M Cottone; C Sategna Guidetti; P Usai; P Cesari; M A Pelli; S Loperfido; U Volta; A Calabró; M Certo Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-08-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: C Cellier; E Delabesse; C Helmer; N Patey; C Matuchansky; B Jabri; E Macintyre; N Cerf-Bensussan; N Brousse Journal: Lancet Date: 2000-07-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Paul Zubillaga; Maria Concepcion Vidales; Itziar Zubillaga; Victor Ormaechea; Nerea García-Urkía; Juan Carlos Vitoria Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: A Al-Toma; W H M Verbeek; O J Visser; K C Kuijpers; J J Oudejans; H C Kluin-Nelemans; C J J Mulder; P C Huijgens Journal: Dig Liver Dis Date: 2007-05-24 Impact factor: 4.088
Authors: Greetje J Tack; Wieke H M Verbeek; Abdul Al-Toma; Dirk J Kuik; Marco W J Schreurs; Otto Visser; Chris J J Mulder Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: David H Dewar; Suzanne C Donnelly; Simon D McLaughlin; Matthew W Johnson; H Julia Ellis; Paul J Ciclitira Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: R L J van Wanrooij; D M J Müller; E A Neefjes-Borst; J Meijer; L G Koudstaal; D A M Heideman; H J Bontkes; B M E von Blomberg; G Bouma; C J J Mulder Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2014-07-27 Impact factor: 8.317
Authors: Gabrielle Christina Colleran; Kevin Christopher Cronin; Mary Casey; Fadel Bennani; Iqdam Tobbia; Kevin Barry Journal: BMJ Case Rep Date: 2009-02-23
Authors: Alberto Rubio-Tapia; Darlene G Kelly; Brian D Lahr; Ahmet Dogan; Tsung-Teh Wu; Joseph A Murray Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-10-08 Impact factor: 22.682