Literature DB >> 17470004

Context effects on remembering and knowing: the expectancy heuristic.

David P McCabe1, David A Balota.   

Abstract

Three experiments are reported examining the effect of context on remember-know judgments. In Experiments 1 and 2, medium-frequency words were intermixed with high-frequency or low-frequency words at study or at test, respectively. Remember responses were greater for medium-frequency targets when they were studied or tested among high-frequency, as compared with low-frequency, words. The authors proposed a decision-based mechanism called "the expectancy heuristic" to explain why remember responses were more likely when items were studied or tested in the context of words that were relatively less distinct. According to the expectancy heuristic, when items on a recognition test exceed an expected level of memorability they will be given a remember judgment but when they do not, but are still more familiar than new words, they will be given a know judgment. Experiment 3, which varied expectancies about the strength of tested targets, demonstrated the use of the expectancy heuristic, indicating that it operates by selectively influencing the remember criterion rather than by influencing recollection of studied items.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17470004     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  9 in total

1.  A direct test of the differentiation mechanism: REM, BCDMEM, and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  The role of extralist associations in false remembering: a source misattribution account.

Authors:  David P McCabe; Lisa Geraci
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

3.  Examining the effect of list composition on monitoring and control processes in metamemory.

Authors:  Skylar J Laursen; Chris M Fiacconi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-10-14

4.  Repetition priming across distinct contexts: effects of lexical status, word frequency, and retrieval test.

Authors:  Jennifer H Coane; David A Balota
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Diffusion model drift rates can be influenced by decision processes: an analysis of the strength-based mirror effect.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff; Corey N White
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Recognition memory for pictorial material in subclinical depression.

Authors:  Cristina Ramponi; Fionnuala C Murphy; Andrew J Calder; Philip J Barnard
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-08-21

7.  Metacognitive effects of initial question difficulty on subsequent memory performance.

Authors:  Ainat Pansky; Morris Goldsmith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10

8.  Recollection-Based Retrieval Is Influenced by Contextual Variation at Encoding but Not at Retrieval.

Authors:  Eyal Rosenstreich; Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Expectation affects learning and modulates memory experience at retrieval.

Authors:  Alex Kafkas; Daniela Montaldi
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-07-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.