Literature DB >> 17469852

The catalytic effect of dihydrofolate reductase and its mutants is determined by reorganization energies.

Hanbin Liu1, Arieh Warshel.   

Abstract

The effect of distant mutations on the catalytic reaction of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) is reexamined by empirical valence bond simulations. The simulations reproduce for the first time the changes in the observed rate constants (without the use of adjustable parameters for this purpose) and show that the changes in activation barriers are strongly correlated with the corresponding changes in the reorganization energy. The preorganization of the polar groups of enzymes is the key catalytic factor, and anticatalytic mutations destroy this preorganization. Some anticatalytic mutations in DHFR also increase the distance between the donor and acceptor, but this effect is not directly related to catalysis since the native enzyme and the uncatalyzed reaction in water have similar average donor-acceptor distances. Insight into the effect of a mutation is provided by constructing the relevant free energy surfaces in terms of the generalized solute-solvent coordinates. It is shown how the mutations change the reaction coordinate and the activation barrier, and it is clarified that the corresponding changes do not reflect dynamical effects. It is also pointed out that all reactions in a condensed phase involve correlated motions (both in enzymes and in solution) and that the change of such motions upon mutations is a result of the change in the shape of the multidimensional reaction path on the solute-solvent surface, rather than the reason for the change in rate constant. Thus, as far as catalysis is concerned, the change in the activation barrier is due to the change in the electrostatic preorganization energy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17469852     DOI: 10.1021/bi700201w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  44 in total

1.  Taking Ockham's razor to enzyme dynamics and catalysis.

Authors:  David R Glowacki; Jeremy N Harvey; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 24.427

2.  Good vibrations in enzyme-catalysed reactions.

Authors:  Sam Hay; Nigel S Scrutton
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 24.427

3.  Evidence that a 'dynamic knockout' in Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase does not affect the chemical step of catalysis.

Authors:  E Joel Loveridge; Enas M Behiry; Jiannan Guo; Rudolf K Allemann
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 24.427

4.  Exploring challenges in rational enzyme design by simulating the catalysis in artificial kemp eliminase.

Authors:  Maria P Frushicheva; Jie Cao; Zhen T Chu; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Exploring the role of large conformational changes in the fidelity of DNA polymerase beta.

Authors:  Yun Xiang; Myron F Goodman; William A Beard; Samuel H Wilson; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-01-01

6.  Computational approach for ranking mutant enzymes according to catalytic reaction rates.

Authors:  Malika Kumarasiri; Gregory A Baker; Alexander V Soudackov; Sharon Hammes-Schiffer
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 7.  Multiple intermediates, diverse conformations, and cooperative conformational changes underlie the catalytic hydride transfer reaction of dihydrofolate reductase.

Authors:  Karunesh Arora; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Top Curr Chem       Date:  2013

8.  The energetics of the primary proton transfer in bacteriorhodopsin revisited: it is a sequential light-induced charge separation after all.

Authors:  Sonja Braun-Sand; Pankaz K Sharma; Zhen T Chu; Andrei V Pisliakov; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2008-03-14

9.  Conformational sampling, catalysis, and evolution of the bacterial phosphotriesterase.

Authors:  C J Jackson; J-L Foo; N Tokuriki; L Afriat; P D Carr; H-K Kim; G Schenk; D S Tawfik; D L Ollis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  On unjustifiably misrepresenting the EVB approach while simultaneously adopting it.

Authors:  Shina C L Kamerlin; Jie Cao; Edina Rosta; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.