Literature DB >> 17469848

Binding of U1A protein changes RNA dynamics as observed by 13C NMR relaxation studies.

Zahra Shajani1, Gary Drobny, Gabriele Varani.   

Abstract

Recognition of RNA by proteins and small molecules often involves large changes in RNA structure and dynamics, yet very few studies have so far characterized these motional changes. Here we extend to the protein-bound RNA recent 13C relaxation studies of motions in the RNA recognized by human U1A protein, a well-known model for protein-RNA recognition. Changes in relaxation observed upon complex formation demonstrate that the protein-binding site becomes rigid in the complex, but the upper stem-loop that defines the secondary structure of this RNA experiences unexpected motional freedom. By using a helix elongation strategy, we observe that the upper stem-loop moves independently of the remainder of the structure also in the absence of U1A. Surprisingly, RNA residues making important intermolecular contacts in the structure of the complex exhibit increased flexibility in the presence of the protein. Both of these results support the hypothesis that RNA-binding proteins select a structure that optimizes intermolecular contacts in the manifold of conformations sampled by the free RNA and that protein binding quenches these motions. Together with previous studies of the RNA-bound protein, they also demonstrate that protein-RNA interfaces experience complex motions that modulate the strength of individual interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17469848     DOI: 10.1021/bi602658x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  23 in total

1.  Extensive backbone dynamics in the GCAA RNA tetraloop analyzed using 13C NMR spin relaxation and specific isotope labeling.

Authors:  James E Johnson; Charles G Hoogstraten
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  RNA dynamics: it is about time.

Authors:  Hashim M Al-Hashimi; Nils G Walter
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Intrinsic flexibility of snRNA hairpin loops facilitates protein binding.

Authors:  Michael Rau; W Tom Stump; Kathleen B Hall
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  Prediction of interacting single-stranded RNA bases by protein-binding patterns.

Authors:  Alexandra Shulman-Peleg; Maxim Shatsky; Ruth Nussinov; Haim J Wolfson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Domain-elongation NMR spectroscopy yields new insights into RNA dynamics and adaptive recognition.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 6.  Characterizing micro-to-millisecond chemical exchange in nucleic acids using off-resonance R relaxation dispersion.

Authors:  Atul Rangadurai; Eric S Szymaski; Isaac J Kimsey; Honglue Shi; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 9.795

Review 7.  The roles of structural dynamics in the cellular functions of RNAs.

Authors:  Laura R Ganser; Megan L Kelly; Daniel Herschlag; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 8.  Characterizing RNA dynamics at atomic resolution using solution-state NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Jameson R Bothe; Evgenia N Nikolova; Catherine D Eichhorn; Jeetender Chugh; Alexandar L Hansen; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Interactions between PTB RRMs induce slow motions and increase RNA binding affinity.

Authors:  Caroline M Maynard; Kathleen B Hall
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  RNA phosphodiester backbone dynamics of a perdeuterated cUUCGg tetraloop RNA from phosphorus-31 NMR relaxation analysis.

Authors:  Jörg Rinnenthal; Christian Richter; Senada Nozinovic; Boris Fürtig; Jakob J Lopez; Clemens Glaubitz; Harald Schwalbe
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.