Literature DB >> 17469028

Retrograde intra-renal surgery for stone extraction.

Dorit E Zilberman1, Yoram Mor, Mordechai Duvdevani, Jacob Ramon, Harry Z Winkler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess various clinical parameters affecting the efficacy and safety profile of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for stone extraction.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between the years 2001 and 2003, 63 patients underwent RIRS in our department for renal calculi, including 25 who had stones >/=20mm in size.
RESULTS: Among the 63 patients who underwent the operation, 19 (30%) had infectious complications postoperatively. Although neither preoperative stenting nor stone burden were found to have any direct implication on postoperative course, a trend was seen as 64% of the infected patients had initially had large renal stones (>/=20mm in diameter) and 59% had been preoperatively drained.
CONCLUSIONS: RIRS is currently considered to be a safe standard retrograde endoscopic procedure for treating renal calculi. However, patients with stones>20 mm in diameter or multiple small calculi, especially in the presence of pre-existing tubes or following prior urinary tract infections, represent a subgroup of patients that are, in general, at higher risk of remarkable infectious complication rates and are likely to experience less satisfying stone-free rates when RIRS surgery is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17469028     DOI: 10.1080/00365590601016321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0036-5599


  2 in total

1.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with scoliosis: our institutional experience.

Authors:  He Qun Chen; Feng Zeng; Lin Qi; Yuan Li
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  More aggressive intrarenal endoscopic maneuvers are assuring a stone free outcome and safety.

Authors:  Artur A Antoniewicz
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.