Literature DB >> 17468976

Colon and rectal injuries during Operation Iraqi Freedom: are there any changing trends in management or outcome?

Scott R Steele1, Kate E Wolcott, Philip S Mullenix, Matthew J Martin, James A Sebesta, Kenneth S Azarow, Alec C Beekley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite the evolution in the management of traumatic colorectal injuries in both civilian and military settings during the previous few decades, they continue to be a source of significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to analyze management and clinical outcomes from a cohort of patients suffering colorectal injuries.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from all patients injured and treated at the 31st Combat Support Hospital during Operation Iraqi Freedom from September 2003 to December 2004.
RESULTS: From the 3,442 patients treated, 175 (5.1 percent) had colorectal injuries. Patients were predominately male (95 percent), suffered penetrating injuries (96 percent), and had a mean age of 29 (range, 4-70) years. Ninety-one percent of patients had associated injuries. Initial management included primary repair (34 percent), stoma (33 percent), resection with anastomosis (19 percent), and damage control only (14 percent). By injury location, stomas were placed more frequently with rectal or sphincter injuries 65 percent (25/40) vs. other sites (right, 19 percent (8/42); transverse, 25 percent (8/32); left, 36 percent (20/55); P < 0.01). Thirteen percent of patients eventually received stomas for failure of initial in-continuity management. Patients with colorectal injuries had a significantly increased mortality rate than those without (18 percent (31/175) vs. 8 percent (269/3267); P < 0.001) but not the subset without colorectal injuries undergoing celiotomy (18 vs.14.4 percent; P = 0.41). Rectal (odds radio, 22; P = 0.03) and transverse colon (odds radio, 17; P = 0.04) injuries were independently associated with increased mortality in multivariate regression analysis. Initial placement of stoma had an independent association with lower leak rates (odds radio, 0.06; P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Injury to the rectum or transverse colon is an independent predictor of mortality. The use of a diverting stoma varied by injury site and was associated with a decreased leak rate but demonstrated no impact on the incidence of sepsis or mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17468976     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-0235-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  20 in total

1.  Wounds of war in the civilian sector: principles of treatment and pitfalls to avoid.

Authors:  L Riddez
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  Evidence-based management of colorectal trauma.

Authors:  Eric K Johnson; Scott R Steele
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Atypical indications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery to avoid major surgery.

Authors:  X Serra-Aracil; L Mora-Lopez; M Alcantara-Moral; C Corredera-Cantarin; C Gomez-Diaz; S Navarro-Soto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Stomas and trauma.

Authors:  David R Welling; James E Duncan
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-02

5.  Characteristics of Combat-Associated Small Bowel Injuries.

Authors:  Mariya E Skube; Quinn Mallery; Elizabeth Lusczek; Joel Elterman; Mary A Spott; Greg J Beilman
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 6.  Historical and current trends in colon trauma.

Authors:  Marlin Wayne Causey; David E Rivadeneira; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-12

Review 7.  Rectal Trauma: Evidence-Based Practices.

Authors:  Michael S Clemens; Kaitlin M Peace; Fia Yi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-12-19

Review 8.  Management of Destructive Colon Injuries after Damage Control Surgery.

Authors:  Jad Chamieh; Priya Prakash; William J Symons
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-12-19

9.  Colon diversion versus primary colonic repair in gunshot abdomen with penetrating colon injury in Libyan revolution conflict 2011 (a single center experience).

Authors:  Salah Mansor; Rashed Bendardaf; Muftah Bougrara; Mohamed Hagam
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Unusual extraperitoneal rectal injuries: a retrospective study.

Authors:  M Gümüş; A Böyük; M Kapan; A Onder; F Taskesen; I Aliosmanoğlu; A Tüfek; M Aldemir
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.