BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze available datasets to assess the degree of asymmetry typically associated with DFSP, and to study the optimal surgical approach for extirpating these tumors by clearing lateral margins. METHODS: MEDLINE (1994-2004) was searched for English-language multi-patient series concerning DFSP. Case series were included if complete information could be obtained for: (a) two-dimensional preoperative tumor size as measured on the skin surface before removal; (b) postoperative tumor size, as estimated by the dimensions of the final wound defect. Four case series met these criteria, and the authors were contacted directly for unpublished raw data. RESULTS: For each of 98 included tumors we computed: (1) the tumor index, a measure of clinically apparent tumor surface area; (2) clearance margin, or the theoretical best and worst-case surgical margins that would have been required for tumor clearance. We used this information to (a) assess the relationship between clinically apparent tumor size and final surgical margin; (b) determine the proportion of tumors of a given size that would be cleared by a margin of given width. We found that standard wide excision margin of 4 cm was predicted to provide a tumor clearance rate of 95% for tumors of preoperative size less than or equal to 3 cm x 3 cm. CONCLUSIONS: There is a weak relationship between preoperative tumor size and the width of the final defect after clearance. Based on our calculations, very wide local excision is necessary for clearance of most DFSPs.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze available datasets to assess the degree of asymmetry typically associated with DFSP, and to study the optimal surgical approach for extirpating these tumors by clearing lateral margins. METHODS: MEDLINE (1994-2004) was searched for English-language multi-patient series concerning DFSP. Case series were included if complete information could be obtained for: (a) two-dimensional preoperative tumor size as measured on the skin surface before removal; (b) postoperative tumor size, as estimated by the dimensions of the final wound defect. Four case series met these criteria, and the authors were contacted directly for unpublished raw data. RESULTS: For each of 98 included tumors we computed: (1) the tumor index, a measure of clinically apparent tumor surface area; (2) clearance margin, or the theoretical best and worst-case surgical margins that would have been required for tumor clearance. We used this information to (a) assess the relationship between clinically apparent tumor size and final surgical margin; (b) determine the proportion of tumors of a given size that would be cleared by a margin of given width. We found that standard wide excision margin of 4 cm was predicted to provide a tumor clearance rate of 95% for tumors of preoperative size less than or equal to 3 cm x 3 cm. CONCLUSIONS: There is a weak relationship between preoperative tumor size and the width of the final defect after clearance. Based on our calculations, very wide local excision is necessary for clearance of most DFSPs.
Authors: Tevhide Bilgen Özcan; Ezgi Hacıhasanoğlu; Mehmet Ali Nazlı; Şefika Aksoy; Cem Leblebici; Canan Kelten Talu Journal: J Breast Health Date: 2016-01-01
Authors: Chimene Kesserwan; Robert Sokolic; Edward W Cowen; Elizabeth Garabedian; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Chyi-Chia Richard Lee; Stefania Pittaluga; Clarymar Ortiz; Kristin Baird; Dolores Lopez-Terrada; Julia Bridge; Alan S Wayne; Fabio Candotti Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Piotr Rutkowski; Martine Van Glabbeke; Cathryn J Rankin; Wlodzimierz Ruka; Brian P Rubin; Maria Debiec-Rychter; Alexander Lazar; Hans Gelderblom; Raf Sciot; Dolores Lopez-Terrada; Peter Hohenberger; Allan T van Oosterom; Scott M Schuetze Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Simone Silva da Costa Aragão; Everson José Dos Santos Leite; Alberto Eduardo Cox Cardoso; Ricardo Luiz Simões Houly Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 1.896
Authors: Dennis A Wicherts; Frits van Coevorden; Houke M Klomp; Martine A van Huizum; J Martijn Kerst; Rick L M Haas; Hester H van Boven; J A van der Hage Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 2.754