OBJECTIVE: To determine whether low dose aspirinprotects women aged 65 or more against cognitive decline. DESIGN: Cohort study within both arms of the women's health study, a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of low dose aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer, 1992-5. SETTING:Women's health study, 1998-2004. PARTICIPANTS: 6377 women aged 65 or more. INTERVENTIONS: Low dose aspirin (100 mg on alternate days) or placebo for a mean of 9.6 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women had three cognitive assessments at two year intervals by telephone. The battery to assess cognition included five tests measuring general cognition, verbal memory, and category fluency. The primary prespecified outcome was a global score, averaging performance across all tests. The key secondary outcome was a verbal memory score, averaging performance on four measures of verbal memory. RESULTS: At the initial assessment (mean 5.6 years after randomisation) cognitive performance in the aspirin group was similar to that of the placebo group (mean difference in global score -0.01, 95% confidence interval -0.04 to 0.02). Mean decline in the global score from the first to the final cognitive assessment was also similar in the aspirin compared with placebo groups (mean difference 0.01, -0.02 to 0.04). The risk of substantial decline (in the worst 10th centile of decline) was also comparable between the groups (relative risk 0.92, 0.77 to 1.10). Findings were similar for verbal memory; however, a 20% lower risk was observed for decline in category fluency with aspirin (relative risk 0.80, 0.67 to 0.97). CONCLUSION: Long term use of low dose aspirin does not provide overall benefits for cognition among generally healthy women aged 65 or more.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether low dose aspirin protects women aged 65 or more against cognitive decline. DESIGN: Cohort study within both arms of the women's health study, a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of low dose aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer, 1992-5. SETTING:Women's health study, 1998-2004. PARTICIPANTS: 6377 women aged 65 or more. INTERVENTIONS: Low dose aspirin (100 mg on alternate days) or placebo for a mean of 9.6 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women had three cognitive assessments at two year intervals by telephone. The battery to assess cognition included five tests measuring general cognition, verbal memory, and category fluency. The primary prespecified outcome was a global score, averaging performance across all tests. The key secondary outcome was a verbal memory score, averaging performance on four measures of verbal memory. RESULTS: At the initial assessment (mean 5.6 years after randomisation) cognitive performance in the aspirin group was similar to that of the placebo group (mean difference in global score -0.01, 95% confidence interval -0.04 to 0.02). Mean decline in the global score from the first to the final cognitive assessment was also similar in the aspirin compared with placebo groups (mean difference 0.01, -0.02 to 0.04). The risk of substantial decline (in the worst 10th centile of decline) was also comparable between the groups (relative risk 0.92, 0.77 to 1.10). Findings were similar for verbal memory; however, a 20% lower risk was observed for decline in category fluency with aspirin (relative risk 0.80, 0.67 to 0.97). CONCLUSION: Long term use of low dose aspirin does not provide overall benefits for cognition among generally healthy women aged 65 or more.
Authors: P S Aisen; K L Davis; J D Berg; K Schafer; K Campbell; R G Thomas; M F Weiner; M R Farlow; M Sano; M Grundman; L J Thal Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-02-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S Weggen; J L Eriksen; P Das; S A Sagi; R Wang; C U Pietrzik; K A Findlay; T E Smith; M P Murphy; T Bulter; D E Kang; N Marquez-Sterling; T E Golde; E H Koo Journal: Nature Date: 2001-11-08 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: M Kivipelto; E L Helkala; M P Laakso; T Hänninen; M Hallikainen; K Alhainen; H Soininen; J Tuomilehto; A Nissinen Journal: BMJ Date: 2001-06-16
Authors: Francine Grodstein; Kimberly A Skarupski; Julia L Bienias; Robert S Wilson; David A Bennett; Denis A Evans Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Brendan J Kelley; Leslie A McClure; Frederick W Unverzagt; Brett Kissela; Dawn Kleindorfer; George Howard; Virginia G Wadley Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Margarete A Wichmann; Karen J Cruickshanks; Cynthia M Carlsson; Rick Chappell; Mary E Fischer; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Carla R Schubert Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2016 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Philip B Gorelick; Angelo Scuteri; Sandra E Black; Charles Decarli; Steven M Greenberg; Costantino Iadecola; Lenore J Launer; Stephane Laurent; Oscar L Lopez; David Nyenhuis; Ronald C Petersen; Julie A Schneider; Christophe Tzourio; Donna K Arnett; David A Bennett; Helena C Chui; Randall T Higashida; Ruth Lindquist; Peter M Nilsson; Gustavo C Roman; Frank W Sellke; Sudha Seshadri Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Cécilia Samieri; Francine Grodstein; Bernard A Rosner; Jae H Kang; Nancy R Cook; Joann E Manson; Julie E Buring; Walter C Willett; Olivia I Okereke Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Dae Hyun Kim; Francine Grodstein; Bernard Rosner; Jae H Kang; Nancy R Cook; Joann E Manson; Julie E Buring; Walter C Willett; Olivia I Okereke Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 6.053