Literature DB >> 17468029

The frequency domain versus time domain methods for processing of intracranial pressure (ICP) signals.

Sverre Holm1, Per Kristian Eide.   

Abstract

Two methods for analyzing intracranial pressure (ICP) waveforms were compared. The frequency domain (FD) method converts the signal from the time domain to the frequency domain by a fast Fourier transform (FFT), while the time domain (TD) method calculates peak-to-peak value of the pulse waveform directly from the time samples. First, the ICP signal was regenerated from the first harmonic of the FFT and compared against the time domain raw ICP signal. We found that the FD method may underestimate pulse amplitude if there is heart rate variability or a high harmonic distortion. Second, to explore the significance in a larger data set, differences between FD- and TD-derived pulse amplitudes were determined for a total of 50,978 6-s time windows of 79 head injury patients. The mean difference in pulse pressure amplitude was 2.9 mmHg for the 50,978 6-s time windows. Differences between TD- and FD-derived pulse amplitudes were >or= 2.0 mmHg in 58.8% of the 50,978 time windows. In about 33% of time windows FD amplitudes were <2 mmHg when TD amplitudes were >or= 4 mmHg, and vice versa. Hence, the TD method is superior to the FD method for calculation of pulse amplitudes. Nevertheless, in this material both the TD and FD methods revealed significantly elevated pulse amplitudes in head injury patients with bad outcome (i.e. Glasgow Outcome Score 1-3).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17468029     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  13 in total

1.  Complexity analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid pulse waveform during infusion studies.

Authors:  David Santamarta; Roberto Hornero; Daniel Abásolo; Milton Martínez-Madrigal; Javier Fernández; Jose García-Cosamalón
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular reactivity using pulse waveform of intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Marcel J H Aries; Marek Czosnyka; Karol P Budohoski; Angelos G Kolias; Danila K Radolovich; Andrea Lavinio; John D Pickard; Peter Smielewski
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Detrended fluctuation analysis of intracranial pressure predicts outcome following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Robert L Burr; Catherine J Kirkness; Pamela H Mitchell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Pulsatile intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  D K Radolovich; M J H Aries; G Castellani; A Corona; A Lavinio; P Smielewski; J D Pickard; M Czosnyka
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Observation of Autoregulation Indices During Ventricular CSF Drainage After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Marcel J H Aries; Sytse F de Jong; J Marc C van Dijk; Joost Regtien; Bart Depreitere; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski; Jan Willem J Elting
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  The pulsating brain: A review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility.

Authors:  Mark E Wagshul; Per K Eide; Joseph R Madsen
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2011-01-18

7.  Patient-adaptable intracranial pressure morphology analysis using a probabilistic model-based approach.

Authors:  Paria Rashidinejad; Xiao Hu; Stuart Russell
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.833

8.  An intracranial pressure-derived index monitored simultaneously from two separate sensors in patients with cerebral bleeds: comparison of findings.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  The effect of baseline pressure errors on an intracranial pressure-derived index: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Angelika Sorteberg; Torstein R Meling; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 10.  The best marker for guiding the clinical management of patients with raised intracranial pressure-the RAP index or the mean pulse amplitude?

Authors:  Allan Hall; Roddy O'Kane
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.