A M Meaney1, V O'Keane. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland. annamariameaney@hotmail.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hyperprolactinaemia is associated with the use of potent dopamine-2 receptor blocking anti-psychotic agents in schizophrenia and with bone loss in the general population. Significantly higher rates of reduced bone mineral density (BMD) have been identified in young pre-menopausal females with schizophrenia receiving prolactin-raising anti-psychotics compared to those receiving prolactin-sparing anti-psychotics. This prospective study compared BMD alterations over a period of 1 year in patients maintained on either prolactin-raising (e.g. risperidone, amisulpride or depot anti-psychotics) or prolactin-sparing (olanzapine) anti-psychotics. The effects of specific interventions to improve BMD were also examined in the context of whether patients were receiving either prolactin-raising or anti-psychotics or Olanzapine. METHODS: Pre-menopausal females (n=38) with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, who had received exclusively either prolactin-raising (n=25) or prolactin-sparing (n=13) anti-psychotics during their treatment history, had clinical, endocrine and bone marker assessments performed at baseline and every 3 months for a period of 1 year. BMD was measured by DEXA scan at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Patients from both groups either received specific interventions (n=16) or no interventions (n=16) to improve bone density. RESULTS: There was an overall gain in lumbar BMD values in the prolactin-sparing subgroup, compared to an overall loss in the prolactin-raising subgroup (p=0.02), for the groups that received no specific interventions to improve BMD. Within the group that received specific interventions, the subgroup receiving prolactin-sparing anti-psychotics had a significant increase in lumbar (p=0.01) and hip (p=0.01) BMD over time, whereas alterations in the prolactin-raising subgroup were not significant. DISCUSSION: Women taking prolactin-raising anti-psychotics and not receiving specific interventions to improve bone density had evidence of ongoing bone demineralisation over a year; whereas women taking prolactin-sparing anti-psychotics had a modest overall increase in BMD. Most clinical interventions appeared to be helpful, but were significantly more effective in those taking prolactin-sparing anti-psychotics.
INTRODUCTION:Hyperprolactinaemia is associated with the use of potent dopamine-2 receptor blocking anti-psychotic agents in schizophrenia and with bone loss in the general population. Significantly higher rates of reduced bone mineral density (BMD) have been identified in young pre-menopausal females with schizophrenia receiving prolactin-raising anti-psychotics compared to those receiving prolactin-sparing anti-psychotics. This prospective study compared BMD alterations over a period of 1 year in patients maintained on either prolactin-raising (e.g. risperidone, amisulpride or depot anti-psychotics) or prolactin-sparing (olanzapine) anti-psychotics. The effects of specific interventions to improve BMD were also examined in the context of whether patients were receiving either prolactin-raising or anti-psychotics or Olanzapine. METHODS: Pre-menopausal females (n=38) with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, who had received exclusively either prolactin-raising (n=25) or prolactin-sparing (n=13) anti-psychotics during their treatment history, had clinical, endocrine and bone marker assessments performed at baseline and every 3 months for a period of 1 year. BMD was measured by DEXA scan at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Patients from both groups either received specific interventions (n=16) or no interventions (n=16) to improve bone density. RESULTS: There was an overall gain in lumbar BMD values in the prolactin-sparing subgroup, compared to an overall loss in the prolactin-raising subgroup (p=0.02), for the groups that received no specific interventions to improve BMD. Within the group that received specific interventions, the subgroup receiving prolactin-sparing anti-psychotics had a significant increase in lumbar (p=0.01) and hip (p=0.01) BMD over time, whereas alterations in the prolactin-raising subgroup were not significant. DISCUSSION: Women taking prolactin-raising anti-psychotics and not receiving specific interventions to improve bone density had evidence of ongoing bone demineralisation over a year; whereas women taking prolactin-sparing anti-psychotics had a modest overall increase in BMD. Most clinical interventions appeared to be helpful, but were significantly more effective in those taking prolactin-sparing anti-psychotics.
Authors: Chadi A Calarge; Stephanie D Ivins; Katherine J Motyl; Amal A Shibli-Rahhal; Michael M Bliziotes; Janet A Schlechte Journal: Ther Adv Psychopharmacol Date: 2013-10
Authors: Taishiro Kishimoto; Marc De Hert; Harold E Carlson; Peter Manu; Christoph U Correll Journal: Curr Opin Psychiatry Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 4.741
Authors: Marc DE Hert; Christoph U Correll; Julio Bobes; Marcelo Cetkovich-Bakmas; Dan Cohen; Itsuo Asai; Johan Detraux; Shiv Gautam; Hans-Jurgen Möller; David M Ndetei; John W Newcomer; Richard Uwakwe; Stefan Leucht Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Judith Usall; Elena Huerta-Ramos; Javier Labad; Jesús Cobo; Christian Núñez; Marta Creus; Gemma García Parés; Daniel Cuadras; José Franco; Eva Miquel; Julio César Reyes; Mercedes Roca Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: S Smith; D Yeomans; C J P Bushe; C Eriksson; T Harrison; R Holmes; L Mynors-Wallis; H Oatway; G Sullivan Journal: Int J Clin Pract Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 2.503