Literature DB >> 17467883

The 20-Yr outcome in patients with well- or moderately differentiated clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed in the pre-PSA era: the prognostic value of tumour ploidy and comorbidity.

Jan Adolfsson1, Bernhard Tribukait, Seymour Levitt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This observational cohort study describes the long-term outcome of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed with watchful waiting, the prognostic value of tumour ploidy, and the impact of comorbidity.
METHODS: A total of 119 patients with clinically localized (T1-2) prostate cancer consecutively diagnosed from 1978 to 1982 were prospectively managed by watchful waiting, with treatment given if progression occurred.
RESULTS: Median age was 68 yr. Median observation time was 24 yr+/-6.25 (SD). Of the 112 patients who died, 42 died of prostate cancer. Disease-specific survival rates were 85% (95% CI: 77-93%), 58% (46-70%), and 32% (19-46%) at 10, 15, and 20 yr, respectively. Treatment-free survival rate was 43% (95% CI: 33-54%) at 10 yr. Patients aged 70 yr and over had a statistically significant increased risk of dying from any cause. There was a statistically significant increased risk of dying from prostate cancer for patients with nondiploid tumours.
CONCLUSION: In the present series from the pre-PSA era, watchful waiting yielded a relatively high long-term disease-specific survival rate in patients with well- or moderately differentiated clinically localized prostate cancer, and almost half were not treated 10 yr after diagnosis. Watchful waiting may be an option at least for such patients with a 10- to 15-yr life expectancy. Age of 70 yr or more predicted an increased overall mortality. High comorbidity increased the risk (although not statistically significant) for death from any cause and for death from prostate cancer. Patients with nondiploid tumours were at an increased risk to die from prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17467883     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  4 in total

1.  ProPSA and diagnostic biopsy tissue DNA content combination improves accuracy to predict need for prostate cancer treatment among men enrolled in an active surveillance program.

Authors:  Sumit Isharwal; Danil V Makarov; Lori J Sokoll; Patricia Landis; Cameron Marlow; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Current status of high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: technology, clinical outcomes, and future.

Authors:  François-Joseph L Murat; Albert Gelet
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  [Prostate cancer. Part 1: Review of cell kinetics over the years 1966-2015 and future perspectives of the new grading of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)].

Authors:  B Helpap; L Bubendorf
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Occult prostate cancer effects the results of case-control studies due to verification bias.

Authors:  Taro Iguchi; Ching Y Wang; Nicolas B Delongchamps; Robert Sunheimer; Tatsuya Nakatani; Gustavo de la Roza; Gabriel P Haas
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.