Literature DB >> 17467513

Valsartan in a Japanese population with hypertension and other cardiovascular disease (Jikei Heart Study): a randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint morbidity-mortality study.

Seibu Mochizuki1, Björn Dahlöf2, Mitsuyuki Shimizu3, Katsunori Ikewaki3, Makoto Yoshikawa3, Ikuo Taniguchi3, Makoto Ohta3, Taku Yamada3, Kazuhiko Ogawa3, Kiyoshi Kanae3, Makoto Kawai3, Shingo Seki3, Fumiko Okazaki3, Masayuki Taniguchi3, Satoru Yoshida3, Naoko Tajima4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system benefit patients at risk for or with existing cardiovascular disease. However, evidence for this effect in Asian populations is scarce. We aimed to investigate whether addition of an angiotensin receptor blocker, valsartan, to conventional cardiovascular treatment was effective in Japanese patients with cardiovascular disease.
METHODS: We initiated a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial of 3081 Japanese patients, aged 20-79 years, (mean 65 [SD 10] years) who were undergoing conventional treatment for hypertension, coronary heart disease, heart failure, or a combination of these disorders. In addition to conventional treatment, patients were assigned either to valsartan (40-160 mg per day) or to other treatment without angiotensin receptor blockers. Our primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Analysis was by intention to treat. The study was registered at clintrials.gov with the identifier NCT00133328.
FINDINGS: After a median follow-up of 3.1 years (range 1-3.9) the primary endpoint was recorded in fewer individuals given valsartan than in controls (92 vs 149; absolute risk 21.3 vs 34.5 per 1000 patient years; hazard ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.47-0.79, p=0.0002). This difference was mainly attributable to fewer incidences of stroke and transient ischaemic attack (29 vs 48; 0.60, 0.38-0.95, p=0.028), angina pectoris (19 vs 53; 0.35, 0.20-0.58, p<0.0001), and heart failure (19 vs 36; 0.53, 0.31-0.94, p=0.029) in those given valsartan than in the control group. Mortality or tolerability did not differ between groups.
INTERPRETATION: The addition of valsartan to conventional treatment prevented more cardiovascular events than supplementary conventional treatment. These benefits cannot be entirely explained by a difference in blood pressure control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17467513     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60669-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  57 in total

1.  Endovascular therapy for thoracic aortic aneurysms: state of the art in 2012.

Authors:  Nicolas A Brozzi; Eric E Roselli
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  Angiotensin receptor blockers and tumorigenesis: something to be (or not to be) concerned about?

Authors:  Vadim Tchaikovski; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  Angiotensin-receptor blockade and risk of cancer: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Ilke Sipahi; Sara M Debanne; Douglas Y Rowland; Daniel I Simon; James C Fang
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  Role of angiotensin II receptor subtype activation in cognitive function and ischaemic brain damage.

Authors:  Masatsugu Horiuchi; Masaki Mogi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Moderate versus intensive treatment of hypertension with amlodipine/valsartan for patients uncontrolled on angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy.

Authors:  Suzanne Oparil; Thomas Giles; Elizabeth O Ofili; Bertram Pitt; Yodit Seifu; Robert Hilkert; Rita Samuel; James R Sowers
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 6.  RAS blockade with ARB and ACE inhibitors: current perspective on rationale and patient selection.

Authors:  Christian Werner; Magnus Baumhäkel; Koon K Teo; Roland Schmieder; Johannes Mann; Thomas Unger; Salim Yusuf; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference guidelines on heart failure, update 2009: diagnosis and management of right-sided heart failure, myocarditis, device therapy and recent important clinical trials.

Authors:  Jonathan G Howlett; Robert S McKelvie; J Malcolm O Arnold; Jeannine Costigan; Paul Dorian; Anique Ducharme; Estrellita Estrella-Holder; Justin A Ezekowitz; Nadia Giannetti; Haissam Haddad; George A Heckman; Anthony M Herd; Debra Isaac; Philip Jong; Simon Kouz; Peter Liu; Elizabeth Mann; Gordon W Moe; Ross T Tsuyuki; Heather J Ross; Michel White
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 8.  Comparative assessment of angiotensin receptor blockers in different clinical settings.

Authors:  Paolo Verdecchia; Fabio Angeli; Salvatore Repaci; Giovanni Mazzotta; Giorgio Gentile; Gianpaolo Reboldi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-11-16

Review 9.  The effect of angiotensin receptor blockers on C-reactive protein and other circulating inflammatory indices in man.

Authors:  Alessandra Del Fiorentino; Silvana Cianchetti; Alessandro Celi; Giulia Dell'Omo; Roberto Pedrinelli
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-04-08

Review 10.  A combined role of calcium channel blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers in stroke prevention.

Authors:  Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.