Literature DB >> 17467355

Birth outcomes associated with interventions in labour amongst low risk women: a population-based study.

Sally K Tracy1, Elizabeth Sullivan, Yueping Alex Wang, Deborah Black, Mark Tracy.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite concern over high rates of operative birth in many countries, particularly amongst low risk healthy women, the obstetric antecedents of operative birth are poorly described. We aimed to determine the association between interventions introduced during labour with interventions in the birth process amongst women of low medical risk.
METHODS: We undertook a population-based descriptive study of all low risk women amongst the 753,895 women who gave birth in Australia during 2000-2002. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were calculated using multinomial logistic regression to describe the association between mode of birth and each of four labour intervention subgroups separately for primiparous and multiparous women.
RESULTS: We observed increased rates of operative birth in association with each of the interventions offered during the labour process. For first time mothers the association was particularly strong.
CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the need for better clinical evidence of the effects of epidurals and pharmacological agents introduced in labour. At a population level it demonstrates the magnitude of the fall in rates of unassisted vaginal birth in association with a cascade of interventions in labour and interventions at birth particularly amongst women with no identified risk markers and having their first baby. This information may be useful for women wanting to explore other methods of influencing the course of labour and the management of pain in labour, especially in their endeavour to achieve a normal vaginal birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17467355     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2007.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  18 in total

1.  The purple line as a measure of labour progress: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ashley Shepherd; Helen Cheyne; Susan Kennedy; Colette McIntosh; Maggie Styles; Catherine Niven
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Effects of epidural analgesia on labor length, instrumental delivery, and neonatal short-term outcome.

Authors:  Junichi Hasegawa; Antonio Farina; Giovanni Turchi; Yuko Hasegawa; Margherita Zanello; Simonetta Baroncini
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery care: M@NGO (Midwives @ New Group practice Options).

Authors:  Sally K Tracy; Donna Hartz; Bev Hall; Jyai Allen; Amanda Forti; Anne Lainchbury; Jan White; Alec Welsh; Mark Tracy; Sue Kildea
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Complementary therapies for labour and birth study: a randomised controlled trial of antenatal integrative medicine for pain management in labour.

Authors:  Kate M Levett; C A Smith; A Bensoussan; H G Dahlen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Paradox of the institution: findings from a hospital labour ward ethnography.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Newnham; Lois V McKellar; Jan I Pincombe
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Striving for scientific stringency: a re-analysis of a randomised controlled trial considering first-time mothers' obstetric outcomes in relation to birth position.

Authors:  Li Thies-Lagergren; Linda J Kvist; Kyllike Christensson; Ingegerd Hildingsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  The diagnostic accuracy of purple line in prediction of labor progress in omolbanin hospital, iran.

Authors:  Masoumeh Kordi; Morvarid Irani; Fatemeh Tara; Habibollah Esmaily
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 0.611

8.  Obstetric interventions in two groups of hospitals in Catalonia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ramón Escuriet; María Pueyo; Herminia Biescas; Cristina Colls; Isabel Espiga; Joanna White; Xavi Espada; Josep Fusté; Vicente Ortún
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Caesarean section following induction of labour in uncomplicated first births- a population-based cross-sectional analysis of 42,950 births.

Authors:  Mary-Ann Davey; James King
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Early versus Late Admission to Labor Affects Labor Progression and Risk of Cesarean Section in Nulliparous Women.

Authors:  Rafael T Mikolajczyk; Jun Zhang; Jagteshwar Grewal; Linda C Chan; Antje Petersen; Mechthild M Gross
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2016-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.