Literature DB >> 17466589

Antibody engineering and modification technologies.

David Filpula1.   

Abstract

Antibody engineering has become a well-developed discipline, encompassing discovery methods, production strategies, and modification techniques that have brought forth clinically investigated and marketed therapeutics. The realization of the long-standing goal of production of fully human monoclonal antibodies has focused intensive research on the clinical employment of this potent drug category. However, antibodies are large macromolecules that pose numerous challenges in formulation, optimal pharmacokinetics, manufacturing, stability, and process development. While further improvements in discovery technologies, such as phage display, ribosome display, and transgenic animals continue to advance our capacity to rapidly screen and refine optimal binding molecules, antibody engineers have recently focused more of their efforts on improving protein production and stability, as well as engineering improved biological properties in the effector domains of monoclonal antibodies. A second long-standing goal of antibody engineering, the development of targeted drugs, has not been wholly realized, but this obvious application for antibodies is currently undergoing increasing exploration. Minimal binding proteins, such as Fab, scFv, and single variable domains are the preferred targeting elements for some investigational drugs, whereas non-immunoglobulin scaffold proteins have been explored as binding proteins in other designs. The necessity to utilize non-protein components in targeted drugs, such as polymers, linkers, and cytotoxics, has brought a convergence of the fields of bioconjugate chemistry and protein engineering in experimental antibody therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17466589     DOI: 10.1016/j.bioeng.2007.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomol Eng        ISSN: 1389-0344


  38 in total

Review 1.  ADME of biologics-what have we learned from small molecules?

Authors:  Thomayant Prueksaritanont; Cuyue Tang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Comparison of humanized IgG and FvFc anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies expressed in CHO cells.

Authors:  Flavia Serpieri; Andre Inocencio; Jose Marcelino de Oliveira; Alécio A Pimenta; Angélica Garbuio; Jorge Kalil; Marcelo M Brigido; Ana Maria Moro
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Antagonistic anti-urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) antibodies significantly inhibit uPAR-mediated cellular signaling and migration.

Authors:  Sai Duriseti; David H Goetz; Daniel R Hostetter; Aaron M LeBeau; Ying Wei; Charles S Craik
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  A differential cell capture assay for evaluating antibody interactions with cell surface targets.

Authors:  David J Sherman; Vania E Kenanova; Eric J Lepin; Katelyn E McCabe; Ken-Ichiro Kamei; Minori Ohashi; Shutao Wang; Hsian-Rong Tseng; Anna M Wu; Christian P Behrenbruch
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  A versatile bifunctional dendritic cell targeting vaccine vector.

Authors:  Welson W Wang; Dipankar Das; Mavanur R Suresh
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Analytical FcRn affinity chromatography for functional characterization of monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Tilman Schlothauer; Petra Rueger; Jan Olaf Stracke; Hubert Hertenberger; Felix Fingas; Lothar Kling; Thomas Emrich; Georg Drabner; Stefan Seeber; Johannes Auer; Stefan Koch; Apollon Papadimitriou
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.857

7.  A novel screening method to assess developability of antibody-like molecules.

Authors:  Neeraj Kohli; Nidhi Jain; Melissa L Geddie; Maja Razlog; Lihui Xu; Alexey A Lugovskoy
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.857

8.  Planar microdevices enhance transport of large molecular weight molecules across retinal pigment epithelial cells.

Authors:  Jennifer S Wade; Tejal A Desai
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.838

9.  Surface engineering of quantum dots for in vivo vascular imaging.

Authors:  Ashwath Jayagopal; Patricia K Russ; Frederick R Haselton
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 4.774

Review 10.  Positron emission tomography imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hao Hong; Yin Zhang; Jiangtao Sun; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.520

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.