BACKGROUND: Subthreshold depression is a highly prevalent condition and a risk factor for developing a major depressive episode. Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy may be a promising approach for the treatment of subthreshold depression. The current study had two aims: (1) to determine whether an internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy intervention and a group cognitive behaviour therapy intervention are more effective than a waiting-list control group; and (2) to determine whether the effect of the internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy differs from the group cognitive behaviour therapy intervention. METHOD: A total of 191 women and 110 men with subthreshold depression were randomized into internet-based treatment, group cognitive behaviour therapy (Lewinsohn's Coping With Depression course), or a waiting-list control condition. The main outcome measure was treatment response after 10 weeks, defined as the difference in pre- and post-treatment scores on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Missing data, a major limitation of this study, were imputed using the Multiple Imputation (MI) procedure Data Augmentation. RESULTS: In the waiting-list control group, we found a pre- to post-improvement effect size of 0.45, which was 0.65 in the group cognitive behaviour therapy condition and 1.00 within the internet-based treatment condition. Helmert contrasts showed a significant difference between the waiting-list condition and the two treatment conditions (p=0.04) and no significant difference between both treatment conditions (p=0.62). CONCLUSIONS: An internet-based intervention may be at least as effective as a commonly used group cognitive behaviour therapy intervention for subthreshold depression in people over 50 years of age.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Subthreshold depression is a highly prevalent condition and a risk factor for developing a major depressive episode. Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy may be a promising approach for the treatment of subthreshold depression. The current study had two aims: (1) to determine whether an internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy intervention and a group cognitive behaviour therapy intervention are more effective than a waiting-list control group; and (2) to determine whether the effect of the internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy differs from the group cognitive behaviour therapy intervention. METHOD: A total of 191 women and 110 men with subthreshold depression were randomized into internet-based treatment, group cognitive behaviour therapy (Lewinsohn's Coping With Depression course), or a waiting-list control condition. The main outcome measure was treatment response after 10 weeks, defined as the difference in pre- and post-treatment scores on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Missing data, a major limitation of this study, were imputed using the Multiple Imputation (MI) procedure Data Augmentation. RESULTS: In the waiting-list control group, we found a pre- to post-improvement effect size of 0.45, which was 0.65 in the group cognitive behaviour therapy condition and 1.00 within the internet-based treatment condition. Helmert contrasts showed a significant difference between the waiting-list condition and the two treatment conditions (p=0.04) and no significant difference between both treatment conditions (p=0.62). CONCLUSIONS: An internet-based intervention may be at least as effective as a commonly used group cognitive behaviour therapy intervention for subthreshold depression in people over 50 years of age.
Authors: Sarah M Ketelaar; Karen Nieuwenhuijsen; Fania R Gärtner; Linda Bolier; Odile Smeets; Judith K Sluiter Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2013-07-28 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Charles F Reynolds; Pim Cuijpers; Vikram Patel; Alex Cohen; Amit Dias; Neerja Chowdhary; Olivia I Okereke; Mary Amanda Dew; Stewart J Anderson; Sati Mazumdar; Frank Lotrich; Steven M Albert Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Lisanne Warmerdam; Annemieke van Straten; Jos Twisk; Heleen Riper; Pim Cuijpers Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 5.428