Literature DB >> 17465924

Geographic structure in a widespread plant-mycorrhizal interaction: pines and false truffles.

J D Hoeksema1, J N Thompson.   

Abstract

Mutualistic interactions are likely to exhibit a strong geographic mosaic in their coevolutionary dynamics, but the structure of geographic variation in these interactions is much more poorly characterized than in host-parasite interactions. We used a cross-inoculation experiment to characterize the scales and patterns at which geographic structure has evolved in an interaction between three pine species and one ectomycorrhizal fungus species along the west coast of North America. We found substantial and contrasting patterns of geographic interaction structure for the plants and fungi. The fungi exhibited a clinal pattern of local adaptation to their host plants across the geographic range of three coastal pines. In contrast, plant growth parameters were unaffected by fungal variation, but varied among plant populations and species. Both plant and fungal performance measures varied strongly with latitude. This set of results indicates that in such widespread species interactions, interacting species may evolve asymmetrically in a geographic mosaic because of differing evolutionary responses to clinally varying biotic and abiotic factors.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17465924     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01287.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  15 in total

1.  Accounting for local adaptation in ectomycorrhizas: a call to track geographical origin of plants, fungi, and soils in experiments.

Authors:  Megan A Rúa; Louis J Lamit; Catherine Gehring; Pedro M Antunes; Jason D Hoeksema; Cathy Zabinski; Justine Karst; Cole Burns; Michaela J Woods
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Influence of phylogenetic conservatism and trait convergence on the interactions between fungal root endophytes and plants.

Authors:  Sevda Haghi Kia; Kyriaki Glynou; Thomas Nau; Marco Thines; Meike Piepenbring; Jose G Maciá-Vicente
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Resource limitation is a driver of local adaptation in mycorrhizal symbioses.

Authors:  Nancy Collins Johnson; Gail W T Wilson; Matthew A Bowker; Jacqueline A Wilson; R Michael Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Comparative phylogenies and host specialization in the alder ectomycorrhizal fungi Alnicola, Alpova and Lactarius (Basidiomycota) in Europe.

Authors:  Juliette Rochet; Pierre-Arthur Moreau; Sophie Manzi; Monique Gardes
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Diversity of floral visitors to sympatric Lithophragma species differing in floral morphology.

Authors:  Mariana Cuautle; John N Thompson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Within-population genetic variability in mycorrhizal interactions.

Authors:  Jason D Hoeksema; Bridget J Piculell; John N Thompson
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009

7.  Prevailing negative soil biota effect and no evidence for local adaptation in a widespread Eurasian grass.

Authors:  Viktoria Wagner; Pedro M Antunes; Michael Ristow; Ute Lechner; Isabell Hensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Process rather than pattern: finding pine needles in the coevolutionary haystack.

Authors:  David R Nash
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2008-05-28

9.  Mapping the genetic basis of symbiotic variation in legume-rhizobium interactions in Medicago truncatula.

Authors:  Amanda J Gorton; Katy D Heath; Marie-Laure Pilet-Nayel; Alain Baranger; John R Stinchcombe
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Interactions of biotic and abiotic environmental factors in an ectomycorrhizal symbiosis, and the potential for selection mosaics.

Authors:  Bridget J Piculell; Jason D Hoeksema; John N Thompson
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.