Jenna H Tilt1, Thomas M Unfried, Belen Roca. 1. Urban Ecology Program, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. jennat@u.washington.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Examine the influence of destinations within walking distance of a residence and vegetation on walking trips and body mass index (BMI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from residences with varying accessibility and greenness. SETTING: Seattle, Washington. SUBJECTS: Stratified random sample of residents, stratified by accessibility and greenness. RESPONSE RATE: 17.5 %, 529 respondents. MEASURES: Accessibility and greenness were measured objectively by Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Network Analysis and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), respectively. Self-reported destinations, natural features, walking trips, BMI, and importance of destinations were measured through a postal survey. RESULTS: Objective accessibility were related to walking trips per month (r(2) = .110, p < .0001), as was subjective greenness (r(2) = .051, p < .0001), although objective measures of actual greenness were not. In areas with high accessibility, BMI was lower in areas that had high NDVI, or more greenness (r(2) = .129428, model p < .0001; t-test of interaction p = .0257). Low NDVI areas were associated with overestimation of the number of destinations within walking distance (F1, 499 = 11.009, p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Objective and subjective measurements of accessibility and greenness led to an understanding of variation among walking trips and BMI in different neighborhoods.
PURPOSE: Examine the influence of destinations within walking distance of a residence and vegetation on walking trips and body mass index (BMI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from residences with varying accessibility and greenness. SETTING: Seattle, Washington. SUBJECTS: Stratified random sample of residents, stratified by accessibility and greenness. RESPONSE RATE: 17.5 %, 529 respondents. MEASURES: Accessibility and greenness were measured objectively by Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Network Analysis and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), respectively. Self-reported destinations, natural features, walking trips, BMI, and importance of destinations were measured through a postal survey. RESULTS: Objective accessibility were related to walking trips per month (r(2) = .110, p < .0001), as was subjective greenness (r(2) = .051, p < .0001), although objective measures of actual greenness were not. In areas with high accessibility, BMI was lower in areas that had high NDVI, or more greenness (r(2) = .129428, model p < .0001; t-test of interaction p = .0257). Low NDVI areas were associated with overestimation of the number of destinations within walking distance (F1, 499 = 11.009, p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Objective and subjective measurements of accessibility and greenness led to an understanding of variation among walking trips and BMI in different neighborhoods.
Authors: Glen E Duncan; Ally Avery; Philip M Hurvitz; Anne Vernez Moudon; Siny Tsang; Eric Turkheimer Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Roland J Thorpe; Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Derek M Griffith; Marino A Bruce; Kisha Coa; Caryn N Bell; Jessica Young; Janice V Bowie; Thomas A LaVeist Journal: Fam Community Health Date: 2015 Oct-Dec
Authors: Cathleen D Zick; Ken R Smith; Jessie X Fan; Barbara B Brown; Ikuho Yamada; Lori Kowaleski-Jones Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 4.634