Literature DB >> 17464883

Linking of digital images to phylogenetic data matrices using a morphological ontology.

Martín J Ramírez1, Jonathan A Coddington, Wayne P Maddison, Peter E Midford, Lorenzo Prendini, Jeremy Miller, Charles E Griswold, Gustavo Hormiga, Petra Sierwald, Nikolaj Scharff, Suresh P Benjamin, Ward C Wheeler.   

Abstract

Images are paramount in documentation of morphological data. Production and reproduction costs have traditionally limited how many illustrations taxonomy could afford to publish, and much comparative knowledge continues to be lost as generations turn over. Now digital images are cheaply produced and easily disseminated electronically but pose problems in maintenance, curation, sharing, and use, particularly in long-term data sets involving multiple collaborators and institutions. We propose an efficient linkage of images to phylogenetic data sets via an ontology of morphological terms; an underlying, fine-grained database of specimens, images, and associated metadata; fixation of the meaning of morphological terms (homolog names) by ostensive references to particular taxa; and formalization of images as standard views. The ontology provides the intellectual structure and fundamental design of the relationships and enables intelligent queries to populate phylogenetic data sets with images. The database itself documents primary morphological observations, their vouchers, and associated metadata, rather than the conventional data set cell, and thereby facilitates data maintenance despite character redefinition or specimen reidentification. It minimizes reexamination of specimens, loss of information or data quality, and echoes the data models of web-based repositories for images, specimens, and taxonomic names. Confusion and ambiguity in the meanings of technical morphological terms are reduced by ostensive definitions pointing to features in particular taxa, which may serve as reference for globally unique identifiers of characters. Finally, the concept of standard views (an image illustrating one or more homologs in a specific sex and life stage, in a specific orientation, using a specific device and preparation technique) enables efficient, dynamic linkage of images to the data set and automatic population of matrix cells with images independently of scoring decisions.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17464883     DOI: 10.1080/10635150701313848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  15 in total

1.  Invertebrate neurophylogeny: suggested terms and definitions for a neuroanatomical glossary.

Authors:  Stefan Richter; Rudi Loesel; Günter Purschke; Andreas Schmidt-Rhaesa; Gerhard Scholtz; Thomas Stach; Lars Vogt; Andreas Wanninger; Georg Brenneis; Carmen Döring; Simone Faller; Martin Fritsch; Peter Grobe; Carsten M Heuer; Sabrina Kaul; Ole S Møller; Carsten Hg Müller; Verena Rieger; Birgen H Rothe; Martin Ej Stegner; Steffen Harzsch
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration.

Authors:  Barry Smith; Michael Ashburner; Cornelius Rosse; Jonathan Bard; William Bug; Werner Ceusters; Louis J Goldberg; Karen Eilbeck; Amelia Ireland; Christopher J Mungall; Neocles Leontis; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Alan Ruttenberg; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Richard H Scheuermann; Nigam Shah; Patricia L Whetzel; Suzanna Lewis
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Assembling the lophotrochozoan (=spiralian) tree of life.

Authors:  Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Automated Integration of Trees and Traits: A Case Study Using Paired Fin Loss Across Teleost Fishes.

Authors:  Laura M Jackson; Pasan C Fernando; Josh S Hanscom; James P Balhoff; Paula M Mabee
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Ontologies as integrative tools for plant science.

Authors:  Ramona L Walls; Balaji Athreya; Laurel Cooper; Justin Elser; Maria A Gandolfo; Pankaj Jaiswal; Christopher J Mungall; Justin Preece; Stefan Rensing; Barry Smith; Dennis W Stevenson
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  Phenex: ontological annotation of phenotypic diversity.

Authors:  James P Balhoff; Wasila M Dahdul; Cartik R Kothari; Hilmar Lapp; John G Lundberg; Paula Mabee; Peter E Midford; Monte Westerfield; Todd J Vision
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The teleost anatomy ontology: anatomical representation for the genomics age.

Authors:  Wasila M Dahdul; John G Lundberg; Peter E Midford; James P Balhoff; Hilmar Lapp; Todd J Vision; Melissa A Haendel; Monte Westerfield; Paula M Mabee
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Next-generation phenomics for the Tree of Life.

Authors:  J Gordon Burleigh; Kenzley Alphonse; Andrew J Alverson; Holly M Bik; Carrine Blank; Andrea L Cirranello; Hong Cui; Marymegan Daly; Thomas G Dietterich; Gail Gasparich; Jed Irvine; Matthew Julius; Seth Kaufman; Edith Law; Jing Liu; Lisa Moore; Maureen A O'Leary; Maria Passarotti; Sonali Ranade; Nancy B Simmons; Dennis W Stevenson; Robert W Thacker; Edward C Theriot; Sinisa Todorovic; Paúl M Velazco; Ramona L Walls; Joanna M Wolfe; Mengjie Yu
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2013-06-26

9.  A gross anatomy ontology for hymenoptera.

Authors:  Matthew J Yoder; István Mikó; Katja C Seltmann; Matthew A Bertone; Andrew R Deans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Matching arthropod anatomy ontologies to the Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology: results from a manual alignment.

Authors:  Matthew A Bertone; István Mikó; Matthew J Yoder; Katja C Seltmann; James P Balhoff; Andrew R Deans
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.