Literature DB >> 17464778

A comparison of voluntary and involuntary measures of electromechanical delay.

J Ty Hopkins1, J Brent Feland, Iain Hunter.   

Abstract

Electromechanical delay (EMD) is a measurement used to assess the mechanical lag between muscle activation onset and force production. EMD measurements may be performed by voluntary or electrically evoked muscle activation. This study compared gastrocnemius EMD during voluntary and involuntary contractions and assessd the intrasession reliability of each set of measurements. Subjects were 15 volunteers (age 21 +/- 2 years, ht 171.8 +/- 10.0 cm, mass 76.1 +/- 13.4 kg). EMD measurements were recorded from the medial head of the gastrocnemius of each subject during voluntary and involuntary contractions. Order was counterbalanced between subjects. Subjects stood with the dominant leg on a force plate, the nondominant next to the force plate, and with their hands in contact with a bar in front of them. A supramaximal percutaneous stimulus was applied to the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa for involuntary (electrically evoked) contractions. For voluntary contractions, subjects were instructed to rise up on the toes as quickly as possible. Four trials were collected for each condition with 30 s of rest between each. Repeated measures ANOVAs were performed for each condition to calculate an ICC (2,1). Means of the 4 trials for each condition were used to detect differences between groups. EMD was greater in the voluntary condition (22.8 +/- 8.2 ms) compared to the involuntary condition (9.7 +/- 3.1 ms; p < .001). Intrasession reliability for each condition was very strong (involuntary ICC (2,1) = .977; voluntary ICC (2,1) = .972). EMD measured during a single leg stance is much shorter when measured during an electrically evoked (voluntary) contraction. The difference in EMD between conditions is likely the result of differences in recruitment during the two types of contractions. Reliability within a measurement session was very strong for each of the conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17464778     DOI: 10.1080/00207450600773764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neurosci        ISSN: 0020-7454            Impact factor:   2.292


  11 in total

1.  Effects of fatigue on the electromechanical delay components in gastrocnemius medialis muscle.

Authors:  Susanna Rampichini; Emiliano Cè; Eloisa Limonta; Fabio Esposito
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Acute effects of passive stretching on the electromechanical delay and evoked twitch properties.

Authors:  Pablo B Costa; Eric D Ryan; Trent J Herda; Ashley A Walter; Katherine M Hoge; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Passive stretching effects on electromechanical delay and time course of recovery in human skeletal muscle: new insights from an electromyographic and mechanomyographic combined approach.

Authors:  Fabio Esposito; Eloisa Limonta; Emiliano Cè
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Evaluating skeletal muscle electromechanical delay with intramuscular pressure.

Authors:  Shanette A Go; William J Litchy; Loribeth Q Evertz; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Using Ankle Bracing and Taping to Decrease Range of Motion and Velocity During Inversion Perturbation While Walking.

Authors:  Emily A Hall; Janet E Simon; Carrie L Docherty
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Detection of the electromechanical delay and its components during voluntary isometric contraction of the quadriceps femoris muscle.

Authors:  Haris Begovic; Guang-Quan Zhou; Tianjie Li; Yi Wang; Yong-Ping Zheng
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Spatial variation and inconsistency between estimates of onset of muscle activation from EMG and ultrasound.

Authors:  Angela V Dieterich; Alberto Botter; Taian Martins Vieira; Anneli Peolsson; Frank Petzke; Paul Davey; Deborah Falla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Characterization of Electromechanical Delay Based on a Biophysical Multi-Scale Skeletal Muscle Model.

Authors:  Laura Schmid; Thomas Klotz; Tobias Siebert; Oliver Röhrle
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Intramuscular Pressure of Tibialis Anterior Reflects Ankle Torque but Does Not Follow Joint Angle-Torque Relationship.

Authors:  Filiz Ateş; Brenda L Davies; Swati Chopra; Krista Coleman-Wood; William J Litchy; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Acute Effects of a High Volume vs. High Intensity Bench Press Protocol on Electromechanical Delay and Muscle Morphology in Recreationally Trained Women.

Authors:  Sandro Bartolomei; Federico Nigro; Ivan Malagoli Lanzoni; Anna Lisa Mangia; Matteo Cortesi; Simone Ciacci; Silvia Fantozzi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.