Literature DB >> 17464617

Failure mechanisms in uncemented Kudo type 5 elbow prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 7 of 49 ulnar components revised because of loosening after 2-10 years.

Justus-Martijn Brinkman1, Maarten J de Vos, Denise Eygendaal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both components of the Kudo type 5 elbow prosthesis can be inserted with or without the use of cement. There have been no reports on the use of this prosthesis with all components uncemented in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 49 primary uncemented Kudo type 5 elbow prostheses, inserted in 36 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, after mean 6 (2-10) years. Patients were assessed clinically both pre- and postoperatively (pain, instability, motion, ulnar neuropathy) and radiographically. Furthermore, at the time of follow-up clinical outcome was assessed using the Elbow Function Assessment Scale.
RESULTS: At review, 7 of 49 elbows had undergone revision because of symptomatic loosening of the ulnar component. In 42 unrevised elbows, clinical outcome was excellent in 29, good in 7, fair in 5, and poor in one. 31 of 42 elbows had no pain; 11 were painful at rest (VAS 1-2) and/or as a result of activity (VAS 1-8). With revision as endpoint, survival was 86% at 6 years. Intraoperative malpositioning of the ulnar component with a valgus or varus alignment of < 5 degrees was associated with worse survival.
INTERPRETATION: We found an unexpectedly high rate of loosening of the ulnar component, which was associated with intraoperative malpositioning of the prosthesis. The ulnar component of this prosthesis should not be inserted without cement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17464617     DOI: 10.1080/17453670710013780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  12 in total

Review 1.  Triceps on approach for total elbow arthroplasty: worth preserving? A review of approaches for total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simon J Booker; Chris D Smith
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-12-13

2.  Clinical results of revision total elbow arthroplasty: comparison of infected and non-infected total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jae-Man Kwak; Erica Kholinne; Yucheng Sun; Myung-Sun Kim; Kyoung-Hwan Koh; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Triceps on, alignment off? A comparison of total elbow arthroplasty component positioning with a triceps-on and a triceps-off approach.

Authors:  A King; S J Booker; W J Thomas; C D Smith
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Does the triceps-on approach affect alignment in total elbow arthroplasty? A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Andrew King; Jonathan P Evans; Simon J Booker; James Cs Beazley; Robin Js Jones; William Jc Thomas; Christopher Smith
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-05-25

5.  Cementation technique for elbow arthroplasty; an international survey.

Authors:  Tariq A Kwaees; Rohit Singhal; Denise Eygendaal; Charalambos P Charalambous
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-07-01

6.  Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Why and How.

Authors:  Ante Prkic; Maarten J de Vos; Marc L Wagener; Bertram The; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2017-02-08

7.  Prospective cohort study comparing a triceps-sparing and triceps-detaching approach in total elbow arthroplasty: a protocol.

Authors:  Danielle Meijering; Alexander L Boerboom; Carina L E Gerritsma; Bertram The; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Marco van der Pluijm; Riemer J K Vegter; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Denise Eygendaal; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Long-term results of the iBP elbow prosthesis: beware of destructive metallosis!

Authors:  Daniëlle Meijering; Alexander L Boerboom; Fred Breukelman; Denise Eygendaal; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Use and outcome of 1,220 primary total elbow arthroplasties from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Replacement Registry 2008-2018.

Authors:  Jetske Viveen; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Job N Doornberg; Alesha Hatton; Richard Page; Koen L M Koenraadt; Christopher Wilson; Gregory I Bain; Ruurd L Jaarsma; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 10.  Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Jae-Man Kwak; Kyoung-Hwan Koh; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.