Literature DB >> 17464528

Can warmwater streams be rehabilitated using watershed-scale standard erosion control measures alone?

F Douglas Shields1, Scott S Knight, Charles M Cooper.   

Abstract

Degradation of warmwater streams in agricultural landscapes is a pervasive problem, and reports of restoration effectiveness based on monitoring data are rare. Described is the outcome of rehabilitation of two deeply incised, unstable sand-and-gravel-bed streams. Channel networks of both watersheds were treated using standard erosion control measures, and aquatic habitats within 1-km-long reaches of each stream were further treated by addition of instream structures and planting woody vegetation on banks ("habitat rehabilitation"). Fish and their habitats were sampled semiannually during 1-2 years before rehabilitation, 3-4 years after rehabilitation, and 10-11 years after rehabilitation. Reaches with only erosion control measures located upstream from the habitat measure reaches and in similar streams in adjacent watersheds were sampled concurrently. Sediment concentrations declined steeply throughout both watersheds, with means > or = 40% lower during the post-rehabilitation period than before. Physical effects of habitat rehabilitation were persistent through time, with pool habitat availability much higher in rehabilitated reaches than elsewhere. Fish community structure responded with major shifts in relative species abundance: as pool habitats increased after rehabilitation, small-bodied generalists and opportunists declined as certain piscivores and larger-bodied species such as centrarchids and catostomids increased. Reaches without habitat rehabilitation were significantly shallower, and fish populations there were similar to the rehabilitated reaches prior to treatment. These findings are applicable to incised, warmwater streams draining agricultural watersheds similar to those we studied. Rehabilitation of warmwater stream ecosystems is possible with current knowledge, but a major shift in stream corridor management strategies will be needed to reverse ongoing degradation trends. Apparently, conventional channel erosion controls without instream habitat measures are ineffective tools for ecosystem restoration in incised, warmwater streams of the Southeastern U.S., even if applied at the watershed scale and accompanied by significant reductions in suspended sediment concentration.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17464528     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-006-0191-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  5 in total

1.  Long-term effect of instream habitat-improvement structures on channel morphology along the Blackledge and Salmon rivers, Connecticut, USA.

Authors:  Douglas M Thompson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  RESEARCH: Warmwater Stream Bank Protection and Fish Habitat: A Comparative Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Ecology. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts.

Authors:  E S Bernhardt; M A Palmer; J D Allan; G Alexander; K Barnas; S Brooks; J Carr; S Clayton; C Dahm; J Follstad-Shah; D Galat; S Gloss; P Goodwin; D Hart; B Hassett; R Jenkinson; S Katz; G M Kondolf; P S Lake; R Lave; J L Meyer; T K O'donnell; L Pagano; B Powell; E Sudduth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Did the pre-1980 use of in-stream structures improve streams? A reanalysis of historical data.

Authors:  Douglas M Thompson
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past.

Authors:  J S Harding; E F Benfield; P V Bolstad; G S Helfman; E B Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Biological assessment to support ecological recovery of a degraded headwater system.

Authors:  Scott D Longing; Brian E Haggard
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Re-meandering German lowland streams: qualitative and quantitative effects of restoration measures on hydromorphology and macroinvertebrates.

Authors:  Armin W Lorenz; Sonja C Jähnig; Daniel Hering
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Consideration of spatial and temporal scales in stream restorations and biotic monitoring to assess restoration outcomes: A literature review, Part 2.

Authors:  Michael B Griffith; Michael G McManus
Journal:  River Res Appl       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 2.443

4.  Managing artificially drained low-gradient agricultural headwaters for enhanced ecosystem functions.

Authors:  Samuel C Pierce; Robert Kröger; Reza Pezeshki
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.