Literature DB >> 17462894

Western scrub-jays anticipate future needs independently of their current motivational state.

Sérgio P C Correia1, Anthony Dickinson, Nicola S Clayton.   

Abstract

Planning for the future has been considered to be a uniquely human trait [1-3]. However, recent studies challenge this hypothesis by showing that food-caching Western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica) can relate their previous experience as thieves to the possibility of future cache theft by another bird [4], are sensitive to the state of their caches at recovery ([5] and S. De Kort, S.P.C.C., D. Alexis, A.D., and N.S.C., unpublished data), and can plan for tomorrow's breakfast [6]. Although these results suggest that scrub-jays are capable of future planning, the degree to which these birds act independently of their current motivational state is a matter of contention. The Bischof-Köhler hypothesis [1] holds that nonhuman animals cannot anticipate and act toward the satisfaction of a future need not currently experienced or cued by their present motivational state. Using specific satiety to control for the jays' current and future motivational states, here we specifically test this hypothesis by dissociating current and future motivational states. We report that Western scrub-jays anticipate the recovery of their caches, as well as their own future needs, by acting independently of their current motivational state and immediate needs. The fact that the birds act in favor of a future need as opposed to the current one challenges the hypothesis that this ability is unique to humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17462894     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  46 in total

Review 1.  Episodic memory in nonhuman animals.

Authors:  Victoria L Templer; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Sequential planning in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Damian Scarf; Erin Danly; Gin Morgan; Michael Colombo; Herbert S Terrace
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Evolution of working memory.

Authors:  Peter Carruthers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The neurobiology of memory based predictions.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum; Norbert J Fortin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Integrating ecology, psychology and neurobiology within a food-hoarding paradigm.

Authors:  Vladimir V Pravosudov; Tom V Smulders
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Problems faced by food-caching corvids and the evolution of cognitive solutions.

Authors:  Uri Grodzinski; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  The future of future-oriented cognition in non-humans: theory and the empirical case of the great apes.

Authors:  Mathias Osvath; Gema Martin-Ordas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Convergent evolution of complex cognition: Insights from the field of avian cognition into the study of self-awareness.

Authors:  Luigi Baciadonna; Francesca M Cornero; Nathan J Emery; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Memory, mental time travel and The Moustachio Quartet.

Authors:  Nicola Clayton; Clive Wilkins
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  Coding of Stimuli by Animals: Retrospection, Prospection, Episodic Memory and Future Planning.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2010-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.